Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:24:39.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photius and the Text of the Fourth Gospel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

J. Neville Birdsall
Affiliation:
Leeds

Extract

I have elsewhere discussed the relations of Photius' gospel citations with the Greek manuscript tradition and the evidence of the versions.2 The conclusion of that discussion is that Photius' text of the Fourth Gospel is closely akin to the group of manuscripts headed by Codex Nanianus (U) and the minuscule 213 (von Soden's Io Group) and to the old Georgian version.

Type
Short Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 61 note 1 Admittedly the Lucan narrative in its present form practically forbids our dissociating v. 49 from Easter Day. But that is part of the familiar discrepancy between the end of Luke and the beginning of Acts.Google Scholar

page 61 note 2 J.T.S. n.s. VII (1956), Pt. II., pp. 193–7.Google Scholar

page 62 note 1 Revue Biblique, LV (1948), pp. 5–34.Google Scholar

page 62 note 2 Migne, P.G. CII, col. 124.Google Scholar

page 62 note 3 Revue Biblique, LVII (1950), pp. 401–8.Google Scholar

page 62 note 4 Migne, P.C. CII, col. 96 (contrast P.C. CI, cols. 267, 748).Google Scholar

page 62 note 5 Migne, P.C. CI, col. 1152.Google Scholar

page 62 note 6 Revue Bibliqus, LX (1953), pp. 350–3.Google Scholar