When humans solve complex problems, they typically construct, reflect, and revise sequences of ideas, hypotheses, and beliefs until a final decision or conclusion is reached. Contrary to this, current machine learning models are mostly trained to map an input to one single and fixed output. In this paper, we investigate how we can equip models with the ability to represent, construct, and evaluate a second, third, and $k$-th thought within their prediction process. Drawing inspiration from Hegel’s dialectics, we propose and evaluate the thought flow concept which constructs a sequence of predictions. We present a self-correction mechanism which (a) is trained to estimate the model’s correctness and which (b) performs iterative prediction updates based on the gradient of the correctness prediction. We introduce our method focusing initially on question answering (QA) and carry out extensive experiments which demonstrate that (i) our method is able to correct its own predictions and that (ii) it can improve model performance by a large margin. In addition, we conduct a qualitative analysis of thought flow correction patterns and explore how thought flow predictions affect users’ human-AI collaboration in a crowdsourcing study. We find that (iii) thought flows improve user performance and are perceived as more natural, correct, and intelligent regarding single and/or top-3 predictions.

Human evaluation of machine translation is considered the “gold standard” for evaluation, but it remains a challenging task for which to define best practices. Recent work has focused on incorporating intersentential context into human evaluation, to better distinguish between high-performing machine translation systems and human translations. In this work, we examine several ways that such context influences evaluation and evaluation protocols. We take a close look at annotator variation through the lens of calibration sets and focus on the implications for context-aware evaluation protocols. We then demonstrate one way in which degraded target-side intersentential context can influence annotator scores of individual sentences, a finding that supports the context-aware approach to evaluation and which also has implications for best practices in evaluation protocols.

The question of context in neural machine translation often focuses on topics related to document-level translation or intersentential context. However, there is a wide range of other aspects that can be considered under the umbrella of context. In this work, we survey ways that researchers have incorporated context into neural machine translation systems and the evaluation thereof. This includes building translation systems that operate at the paragraph level or the document level or ones that translate at the sentence level but incorporate information from other sentences. We also consider how issues like terminology consistency, anaphora, and world knowledge or external information can be considered as types of context relevant to the task of machine translation and its evaluation. Closely tied to these topics is the question of how to best evaluate machine translation output in a way that is sensitive to the contexts in which it appears. To this end, we discuss work on incorporating context into both human and automatic evaluations of machine translation quality. Furthermore, we also discuss recent experiments in the field as they relate to the use of large language models in translation and evaluation. We conclude with a view of the future of machine translation, where we expect to see issues of context continue to come to the forefront.

The aim of this article is to propose a new neural machine translation (NMT) evaluation method based on the non-inferiority principle. In order to do that, we evaluate raw machine translation (MT) in terms of naturalness, which for this research is defined as not just the lack of fluency errors but also meeting the linguistic expectations of Galician end users when reading original texts in Galician. Our main objective is, in the first place, to validate the new methodology presented in our previous study by evaluating an NMT engine from Spanish into Galician for the social media domain that was retrained with a new Twitter corpus. This new methodology and NMT engine were applied after analyzing the conclusions of a pilot survey conducted among Twitter users to evaluate their perception of tweets translated from Spanish into Galician with our NMT engine created with a corpus of tweets. As in our preliminary study, our aim is to propose a robust quality approximation method based on the reception parameters of end users’ perceptions. This new survey was conducted in December of 2022 with the participation of 228 Galician-speaking Twitter users. Among the main changes proposed are the inclusion of more information about the participant profile, so the non-inferiority principle can be also evaluated according to these parameters; the inclusion of a new typology of tweets, the threads; the provision of context by means of presenting the tweets in their original display as shown in the Twitter app; a change in the number of tweets evaluated and the number of different questionnaires; the change in the distribution of the questionnaires; and the inclusion of an error classification human evaluation conducted by professional linguists to correlate the findings. We will present the steps carried out following the conclusions of the pilot study, describe the new study’s design, analyze the new findings, and present the final conclusions regarding the engine and the evaluation method based on the non-inferiority principle. Finally, we will also provide some examples of the use of this new methodology in the translation industry.

The overall translation quality reached by current machine translation (MT) systems for high-resourced language pairs is remarkably good. Standard methods of evaluation are not suitable nor intended to uncover the many translation errors and quality deficiencies that still persist. Furthermore, the quality of standard reference translations is commonly questioned and comparable quality levels have been reached by MT alone in several language pairs. Navigating further research in these high-resource settings is thus difficult. In this paper, we propose a methodology for creating more reliable document-level human reference translations, called “optimal reference translations,” with the simple aim to raise the bar of what should be deemed “human translation quality.” We evaluate the obtained document-level optimal reference translations in comparison with “standard” ones, confirming a significant quality increase and also documenting the relationship between evaluation and translation editing.