Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:52:46.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ethnic dimension to bureaucratic encounters in postcommunist Europe: perceptions and experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2000

Åse B. Grødeland
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Glasgow
William L. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Glasgow
Tatyana Y. Koshechkina
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Glasgow
Get access

Abstract

In a survey of public opinion about the behaviour of officials in four postcommunist countries – Ukraine, Bulgaria, Slovakia and the Czech Republic – we found pervasive suspicions of ethnic bias. Although ethnic minorities themselves were particularly suspicious of officials, there was a consensus across both ethnic majorities and minorities that officials favoured their own ethnic group and discriminated against others.

Suspicion may distort reality, however. Citizen' own reports of dealing with officials generally revealed much less ethnic discrimination in their personal experience than in their suspicions, presumptions and perceptions. Either suspicion exaggerated reality or general perceptions of bias focused on the most badly treated, rather than the most numerous, minorities.

Ethnic minorities themselves behaved in different ways towards officials. Amongst the ethnic minorities covered in this study, only Gypsies displayed the characteristics of hopelessness and ‘exclusion’. Some minorities behaved much like the titular nationality. But most compensated for their minority status by engaging more than the titular nationality in a wide range of strategies to influence officials – including the use of contacts, presents and bribes. Conversely, in areas where an ethnic minority was concentrated locally, members of the titular nationality displayed a measurably defensive reaction and a somewhat heightened degree of vigilance.

The paper is based on a total of 6,050 interviews made in the winter of 1997–8, including representative country-wide samples and special additional samples in areas where ethnic minorities were concentrated. It compares the four titular nationalities with eight ethnic minorities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)