Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:30:48.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hungarian Foreign Policy and the Magyar Minorities: New Foreign Policy Priorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Alfred A. Reisch*
Affiliation:
RFE/RL Research Institute, Munich

Extract

In the wake of the 1989 revolutions in East Central Europe, two parallel developments took place in rapid succession. On the one hand, strong national sentiments accompanied by a desire to set up independent nation states emerged in the countries neighboring Hungary. At the same time, the ethnic Magyar minorities, long excluded from participation in the political life of those countries, gained the ability to establish their political movements, to enter candidates in local and national elections, and to elect their own deputies in the national parliaments and local governments. On the other hand, the fate of the Magyar minorities and the guaranteeing of their rights became one of the central elements of Hungary's foreign policy in bilateral relations with its neighbors. Budapest also embarked on a major effort to make the minority problem an international issue and to achieve some form of international legal codification for minority rights. These simultaneous and, in part, contradictory developments and goals placed several dilemmas before Hungarian policy-makers that, three years later, have yet to be resolved.

Type
II Hungary and Hungarian Minorities
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe and ex-USSR, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Budapest, Radio, 22 May, 1990; Magyar Nemzet and Népszabadság , 23 May, 1990.Google Scholar

2. The Foreign Policy Projection of Minority Policy” in The Program of National Renewal (Lajosmizse, 1990), pp. 184185; Antall's statement to MTI, 20 April, 1991; and Uj Magyarország, 29 June, 1992.Google Scholar

3. Author's interview with Jeszenszky on 24 June, 1990, in Budapest. See also the Report on Eastern Europe, No. 30, 27 July, 1990.Google Scholar

4. Interview with the BBC, 4 September, 1990 (CARIS Report No. 11/90).Google Scholar

5. See the interviews with Entz in Magyar Nemzet , 17 July, 1991; Uj Magyar Hirek, November 1991; Magyar Hirlap, 14 December, 1991, and 19 February, 1992; Ring, 5 August, 1992; and Magyar Fórum, 6 August, 1992; and with Horvath in Heti Magyarország, 12 July, 1991.Google Scholar

6. On the tasks and work of these societies, see Magyar Fórum, 28 November, 1991; on the involvement of the Academy, Magyar Nemzet, 30 January, 1992; for the document drafted by the forum of Hungarians abroad at the WFH's August 1992 congress in Budapest, see ibid., 24 August, 1992.Google Scholar

7. See Entz's interview in ibid., 19 February, 1992; MTI and Rompres, 26 February, 1992; and Népszabadság, 27 February, 1992.Google Scholar

8. RFE Correspondent's Report (Washington), 12 June, 1990.Google Scholar

9. On the closing document, see Magyar Hirlap, 30 June, 1990; as well as the interview with Erdös in Magyar Nemzet, 15 June, 1990; and RFE/RL Correspondent's Report (Copenhagen), 11–12 June, 1990.Google Scholar

10. Interviews with Entz in Népszabadság , 1 July, 1991, and with his deputy István Zalatnay in Népszava, 26 June, 1991; RFE/RL Correspondent's Report (Geneva), 4 July, 1991; and Romániai Magyar Szó, 5 July, 1991.Google Scholar

11. For Entz's opening speech and the position of the Hungarian delegation, see ibid., 23–24 July. On collective rights, see Eckart Klein's article in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 18 June, 1991.Google Scholar

12. For the speech of Romanian delegation leader Traian Chebeleu and his reply to Entz, see ibid., 23, 25, and 26 July, 1991.Google Scholar

13. See the interview with Kampelman in Népszabadság, 20 July, 1991; and Magyar Hirlap, 20 July, 1991.Google Scholar

14. See the interviews with Entz and Romanian delegation leader Traian Chebeleu in Népszabadság, 22 July, 1992; Heti Magyarország , 26 July and 2 August, 1991; and Beszélö, 27 July, 1991. For a Western view, Neue Züriche Zeitung, 13 July, 1991.Google Scholar

15. RFE Correspondent's interview with Hungarian foreign ministry department head Iván Baba in Budapest, 17 June, 1991; interview with Chebeleu in Népszabadság, 22 July, 1991; and A Hét (Bratislava), 13 September, 1991.Google Scholar

16. Népszabadság, Magyar Hirlap, and Magyar Nemzet , 11 September, 1991; and RFE/RL Correspondent's report (Budapest), 6 September, 1991.Google Scholar

17. Népszabadság, 5 and 10 October, 1991. A six-party Hungarian parliamentary delegation that attended the conference found Romania more amenable than it had been in Geneva (Magyar Nemzet , 28 September, 1991; MTI, 9 October, 1991.Google Scholar

18. , MTI, October 21, 1991; and Zoltán Kiss, “Minority and Security,” Uj Honvédelmi Szemle, No.1, 1992, pp. 4044.Google Scholar

19. RFE/RL Correspondent's Report (Helsinki), 1 April, 1992. Also Anja Heise, “Minority Problems in the Framework of the CSCE,” Osteuroparecht, June 1992, pp. 242247.Google Scholar

20. RFE/RL Correspondent's Report (Helsinki), 7 July, 1992; Hans van der Broek, “‘Fire Brigade’ Against Nationalism,” Die Presse , 16 July, 1992; and the interview with van der Stoel during his Budapest visit in Magyar Hirlap, 20 February, 1993.Google Scholar

21. Council of Europe Press Release of 5 November, 1992; and the interview with Jeszenszky in Uj Magyarország, 1 October, 1992. Also Klaus Dicke, “The UN Declaration on Minority Protection,” Europa Archiv, 25 February, 1993, pp. 107-116; AFP, 4 November, 1992; RFE/RL Correspondent's Report (Strasbourg), 5 November, 1992; and Magyar Hirlap, 6 November, 1992. Hungary played a major role in the drafting of the charter, which must be ratified by five states in order to come into force.Google Scholar

22. RFE/RL Correspondent's Report (Strasbourg), 2 February, 1993; Népszabadság and Neue Züriche Zeitung , 3 February, 1993.Google Scholar

23. See the interview with Entz in Magyar Hirlap, 14 December, 1991 and 19 February, 1992, and in Erdélyi Magyarság, May 1992; and also with Antall's foreign policy advisor, Gyula Kodolányi in Töszde Kurir , 23 December, 1992.Google Scholar

24. Interview on Radio Budapest, 3 January, 1993. See also Le Monde, 12 February, 1993.Google Scholar

25. Antall on Hungarian Television, 16 August, 1992; MTI, 18 August, 1992; and Reuters, 19 August, 1992.Google Scholar

26. Interview in Magyar Nemzet , 6 February, 1993. On aggressive nationalism, see Jeszenszky's interview in Uj Magyarország, 24 December, 1992. See also the interview with foreign ministry spokesman János Herman in Népszava, 9 January, 1993.Google Scholar

27. See the interviews with Entz in Népszava, 4 February, 1993; and with Jeszenszky in Magyar Hirlap, 3 February, 1992, and Népszabadság, 12 August, 1992; also Magyar Hirlap , 27 February, 1992. For an extremist Serbian charge that Hungary is fomenting secessionism in Vojvodina, Romania, and Slovakia in order to recreate a Great Hungary, see Elvira Fekete's 23 February, 1993, report on Novi Sad Television, as reported in Uj Magyarország, 9 April, 1993.Google Scholar

28. , Reisch, “Hungarian Parties Seek To Reassure Romania on Border Issue,” Report on Eastern Europe, No. 24, 15 June, 1990, and Magyar Nemzet, 16 February, 1991.Google Scholar

29. Uj Magyarország, 20–21 February, 1992; Rompres, 21 February, 1992; MTI, 25 February, 1992; Magyar Hirlap, 2 March, 1992. See also Oltay, Edith, “Minorities as Stumbling Blocks in (Hungary's) Relations with Neighbors,” RFE/RL Research Report, No. 19, 8 May, 1992.Google Scholar

30. Heti Világgazdaság, 13 February, 1993; and Reisch, “First Law on Minorities Drafted,” Report on Eastern Europe, No. 50, 13 December, 1991.Google Scholar

31. , Reisch, “Agreements Signed with Ukraine to Update Bilateral Relations,” ibid., No. 25, 21 June, 1991.Google Scholar

32. , Reisch, “Transcarpathia's Hungarian Minority and the Autonomy Issue,” RFE/RL Research Report, No. 6, 7 February, 1992; and Reisch, “Hungarian-Ukrainian Relations Continue to Develop,” ibid., No. 16, 16 April, 1993.Google Scholar

33. Ceausçescu had literally closed the consulate in 1988, while the university had been shut down by the Romanian authorities in 1959. See Jeszenszky's interviews in Magyar Nemzet, 6 February, 1993, and Uj Magyarország, 27 July, 1992, and 24 December, 1992; along with his statement on Hungarian-Romanian relations in Népszabadság, 3 December, 1992. See also Edith Oltay, “Minority Rights Still an Issue in Hungarian-Romanian Relations,” RFE/RL Research Report, No. 12, 20 March, 1992.Google Scholar

34. See the interviews with Marko in Magyar Fórum, 18 February, 1993; Pesti Hirlap, 22 February, 1993; and Uj Magyarország, 11 March, 1993. Also Neue Züriche Zeitung, 20 January, 1993; Le Monde, 12 February, 1993; and Michael Shafir, “The HDUR Congress: Confrontations Postponed,” RFE/RL Research Report, No. 9, 26 February, 1993. On Funar, see Tom Gallagher, “Ultranationalist Takes Charge of Transylvania's Capital,” ibid., No. 13, 27 March, 1992.Google Scholar

35. MTI and Radio Budapest, 20 March, 1993; and Magyar Hirlap, Népszabadság, Uj Magyarország, and Tineretul liber , 22 March, 1993. See also interviews with Jeszenszky on Hungarian Television, 21 March, 1993; and with Melescanu in Le Monde, 16 January, 1993; and on Romanian Television, 9 March, 1993.Google Scholar

36. On the continuing controversies marring Hungarian-Romanian relations, see Magyar Hirlap, 8 April, 1993; Magyar Nemzet, 10 April, 1993; and Jeszenszky's interview in Romániai Magyar Szó, 26 April, 1993. Also Die Presse, 26 April, 1993; and Süddeutsche Zeitung, 30 April, 1993.Google Scholar

37. , Reisch, “Hungarian-Russian Relations Enter a New Era,” RFE/RL Research Report, No. 2, 8 January, 1993; Iliescu's interview with Rompres, 26 November, 1992; and Reuters, 26 November, 1992.Google Scholar

38. , Reisch, “Hungarian Ethnic Parties Prepare for Czechoslovak Elections,” RFE/RL Research Report, No. 18, 1 May, 1992.Google Scholar

39. , Reisch, “The Difficult Search for a Hungarian-Slovak Accord,” ibid., No. 42, 23 October, 1992; and “Meciar and Slovakia's Hungarian Minority,” ibid., No. 43, 30 October, 1992. On the issue of autonomy, see Magyar Hirlap and Népszabadság, 6 April, 1993; and Magyar Nemzet, 26 April, 1993.Google Scholar

40. See Duray's interviews in Magyar Nemzet, 2 March, 1993; and in Uj Magyarország, 27 February, 1993; along with his speech at Coexistence's fourth national congress in Köztársaság, 5 March, 1993. See also Heti Magyarország and Pesti Hirlap , 4 March, 1993.Google Scholar

41. RFE/RL Correspondent's Report (Prague), 27 April, 1993. Also Meciar's address on Slovakia's Television, 25 April, 1993; and Slovakia's Parliament Chairman Ivan Gasparovic's interview in Uj Magyarország, 9 April, 1993.Google Scholar

42. Croatia, On, see Népszabadság, 17 March, 1993; MTI, 26 March, 1993 and 23 April, 1993; and Uj Magyarország, 26 April, 1993. On the accord with Slovenia, Uj Magyarország , 7 November, 1992.Google Scholar

43. , Reisch, “Hungary's Policy on the Yugoslav Conflict: A Delicate Balance,” Report on Eastern Europe, No. 32, 9 August, 1992; and Edith Oltay, “Hungarians in Yugoslavia Seek Guarantees for Minority Rights,” ibid., No. 38, 20 September, 1991.Google Scholar

44. See the interviews with DCHV Chairman András Ágoston in Köztársaság, 22 January, 1993, Pesti Hirlap, 16 January, 1993, and Uj Magyarország, 19 December, 1992. Also Magyar Hirlap, 24 December, 1992, and 9 January, 1993; Die Welt , 23 January, 1993; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 27 February, 1993; and Le Figaro, 10 March, 1993.Google Scholar

45. See Antall on Radio Budapest, 3 January, 1993; Jeszenszky's interviews in Magyar Hirlap, 15 June, 1992, and to AP, 6 April, 1993; and Hungarian UN Ambassador Andre Erdös to RFE/RL Correspondent (New York), 7 April, 1993. For Hungary's course during the Yugoslav crisis, see Kapu, January, 1993.Google Scholar

46. See the interviews with Zsolt Németh, an Alliance of Young Democrats deputy, in Népszabadság, 31 October, 1991; and with Kiss, Gy. Csaba, the Director of the Central European Institute, in Magyar Nemzet, 12 September, 1991.Google Scholar

47. Éger, György, “Short History of Burgenland's Magyars,” (Budapest, 1991).Google Scholar

48. See Jeszenszky's speech at the UN General Assembly's 47th session, MTI, 6 October, 1992; and his interviews in Népszabadság, 25 June, 1992, and Uj Magyarország, 15 June, 1992.Google Scholar