Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 March 2020
This note responds to the recent critique by Goodridge, Haskel and Wallis (GHW) of our 2012 study of Britain's productivity puzzle. We show that a correct reworking of the latest official data on changes in labour composition overturns GHW's main criticism. We also question the strength of the empirical evidence offered by GHW in support of their alternative explanations of the productivity puzzle.
Jonathan Haskel invited our comment on an earlier published version of the GHW paper (Goodridge, Haskel and Wallis, 2013) but other commitments and the unavailability of official data prevented our swifter reply.