Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:27:37.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Assessment of the Independent Commission on Banking's Recommendations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Angus Armstrong
Angus Armstrong*
Affiliation:
NIESR
*
e-mail:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The government set up the Independent Commission on Banking (ICB) to consider structural and non-structural measures to promote stability and competition in the UK banking system. They have produced a comprehensive assessment covering some of the key issues facing the banking industry. The ICB's three core recommendations are: a ring-fence to separate retail and wholesale banking activities; banks are required to have more lossabsorbing capital; and greater competition in retail banking markets. In some respects, the recommendations are a step back towards an earlier time of compartmentalised banking. The litmus test is whether they deliver a similar period of financial stability and economic growth.

Type
Commentary
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 218 , October 2011 , pp. F4 - F12
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

This commentary has benefited from helpful comments and discussion with Rev. Prof. E. Philip Davis.

References

Allen, F. and Gale, D. (2004), ‘Competition and financial stability’, Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 36 (3), pp. 453–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. (1973), ‘Social responsibility and economic efficiency’, Public Policy, 21, pp. 303–18.Google Scholar
Bank of England, (2011), Financial Stability Report, Issue 29.Google Scholar
Bordo, M., Eichengreen, B., Klingebiel, D. and Soledad Martinez- Peria, M. (2001), ‘Is the crisis problem growing more severe?’ Economic Policy, 16 (32), pp. 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, J. and Surti, J. (2011), ‘Making banks safer: can Volcker and Vickers do it?’, IMF Working Paper, WPII/236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, D. and Rajan, R. (2000), ‘A theory of bank capital’, Journal of Finance, 55 (6), pp. 2431–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D. (2011), How Big banks Fail and What to Do About It, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, T., Murdock, K. and Stiglitz, J. (2000), ‘Liberalisation, moral hazard and prudential regulation: are capital requirements enough?’, American Economic Review, 90 (1), pp. 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Independent Commission on Banking, (2011), Final Report, National Archive, http://bankingcommission.independent.gov.uk/Google Scholar
Kashyap, A., Rajan, R. and Stein, J. (2008), ‘Rethinking capital regulation’, in Maintaining stability in a Changing Financial System,: Symposium sponsored by the FRBKC, pp. 431–72.Google Scholar
Laeven, L. and Valencia, F. (2008), ‘Systemic banking crises: a new database’, IMF Working Paper, WP08/224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, R. (2004), ‘The corporate governance of banks’, World Bank Research Paper 3404.Google Scholar
Pegano, M. and Volpin, P. (2010), Securitisation, Transparency and Liquidity, CESF No. 210.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. and Weiss, A. (1981), ‘Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information’, American Economic Review, 71 (3), pp. 393–410.Google Scholar
Shin, H.S. (2010), Risk and Liquidity, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar