Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:12:29.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding the Role of Process Parameters on the Characteristics of Transition Metal Oxide RRAM/Memristor Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2011

Branden Long
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606, U.S.A.
Yibo Li
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606, U.S.A.
Rashmi Jha
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In this report, we studied the role of the oxygen concentration in TiOx layer of Ni/TiOx/TiO2/Ni stack based 2-terminal resistive random access memory (RRAM) devices. The sample with oxygen deficient TiOx layer showed Schottky diode type J-V characteristics in the as-fabricated state while the sample with higher oxygen content in TiOx demonstrated MIM or back-to-back connected diode behavior. The Capacitance-Voltage (C-V) profiling was performed and doping density vs. depletion width characteristic was obtained. The conductance technique was implemented to study the interface state density. The RRAM type switching behavior of these samples was studied. The sample with high oxygen in TiOx showed filament based switching after electroforming while the sample with low oxygen in TiOx showed switching governed by the charge trapping.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Waser, Rainer, and Aono, Masakazu, Nature Materials, Vol. 6 (2007)Google Scholar
2. Yang, Joshua, Pickett, Matthew D., Li, Xuema, Ohlberg, Douglas A.A., Stewart, Duncan R., and Williams, Stanley, Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 3 (2008)Google Scholar
3. Schroder, D.K., 2nd Edition, Wiley-Interscience (1998)Google Scholar
4. Shima, Hisashi, Zhong, Ni, and Akinaga, Hiro, Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 94, (2009)Google Scholar
5. Proskuryakov, Y.Y., Major, J.D., Durose, K., Barrioz, V., Irvine, S.J., Jones, E.W., Lamb, D., Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 91 (2007)Google Scholar
6. Alexandrov, P., Koprinarova, J., Todorov, T., Vacuum, Vol. 47, Iss. 11(1996)Google Scholar
7. Engel-Herbert, Roman, Hwang, Yoontae, and Stemmer, Susanne, J. of Appl. Phys. Vol. 108 (2010)Google Scholar
8. Pickett, Matthew D., Strukov, Dmitri B., Borghetti, Julien L., Joshua Yang, J., Snider, Gregory S., Stewart, Duncan R., and Stanley Williams, R., J. of Appl. Phys. Vol. 106 (2009)Google Scholar