Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:22:36.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Stability and Substitutional Carbon Incorporation far above Solid-Solubility in Si1-xCx and Si1-x-yGexCy Layers Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition using Disilane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

M. S. Carroll
Affiliation:
Present address: Agere Systems, Murray Hill NJ
J. C. Sturm
Affiliation:
Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton NJ; E. Napolitani, D. De Salvador, and M. Berti INFM and Dept. of Physics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Growth conditions for epitaxy of Si1-x-yGexCx and Si1-xCx alloy layers on (100) silicon substrates by rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD) with disilane as the silicon source gas are described and the Si1-xCx conditions are compared to previously reported RTCVD growth conditions for epitaxy of Si1-xCx using silane as the source gas. The thermal stability of the layers at 850°C in nitrogen is examined using x-ray diffraction as a measure of the average substitutional carbon concentration in the layers after annealing. A characteristic time constant to describe the reduction of average substitutional carbon concentration in the layer is extracted from the XRD measurements. The characteristic time constants are found to agree within a factor of 3 with that observed in previous reports. However, the time constants are found to depend more strongly on the as-grown substitutional carbon concentration than what is predicted by simple precipitation kinetics, assuming carbon diffusion to a constant number of nucleation centers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ruecker, H. and Heinemann, B., Solid-State Elec., vol. 44, pp. 783, 2000.Google Scholar
[2] Williams, R. L., Aers, G. C., Rowell, N. L., Brunner, K. L., Winter, W., and Eberl, K., Applied Physics Letters, vol. 72, pp. 1320, 1998.Google Scholar
[3] Brunner, K., Eberl, K., and Winter, W., Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 76, pp. 303, 1996.Google Scholar
[4] Schmidt, O. G. and Eberl, K., Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 80, pp. 3396, 1998.Google Scholar
[5] Osten, J., Myeongcheol, K., Pressel, K., and Zaumseil, K., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 80, pp. 6711, 1996.Google Scholar
[6] Mitchell, T. O., Hoyt, J. L., and Gibbons, J. F., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 71, pp. 1688, 1997.Google Scholar
[7] Sturm, J. C., Schwartz, P. V., Prinz, E. J., and Manoharan, H., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B, vol. 9, pp. 2011, 1991.Google Scholar
[8] Taylor, W. J., Tan, W. Y., and Goesele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 62, pp. 2336, 1995.Google Scholar
[9] Shimura, F., Hocket, R. S., Reed, D. A., and Wayne, D. H., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 47, pp. 794, 1985.Google Scholar
[10] Warren, P., Mi, J., Overney, F., and Dutoit, M., J. of Crystal Growth, vol. 157, pp. 414419, 1995.Google Scholar
[11] Strane, J. W., Stein, H. J., Lee, S. R., Picraux, S. T., Watanabe, J. K., and Mayer, J. W., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 76, pp. 3656, 1994.Google Scholar
[12] Fischer, G. G., Zaumseil, P., Bugeil, E., and Osten, J., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 77, pp. 1934, 1995.Google Scholar
[13] Kulik, L. V., Hits, D. A., Dashiell, M. W., J. Kolodzey, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 72, pp. 1972, 1998 Google Scholar