Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:58:06.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Substrate Surface Morphology and Growth Evolution of Low Temperature Silicon Nitride on Transparent Plastics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L. L. Smith
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7905
C. B. Arthur
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7905
C. S. Yang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7905
G. N. Parsons
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7905
Get access

Abstract

Surface morphology and nucleation are important for forming electronic thin films on plastic substrates. We have used atomic force microscopy (AFM) with an oscillating cantilever to examine various transparent substrates, including 7059 glass, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated PET, and polycarbonate, and studied the effect of deposition processes on these surfaces. Studies include: 1) differences in dielectric nucleation on plastics and glass; 2) dielectric growth evolution; and 3) the effect of plasma exposure on surface roughness. The surface morphology of the different substrate materials varied significantly with the PET showing the largest roughness values; all the polymers were more rough than typical 7059 glass (rms <0.5 nm). Furthermore, the initial nucleation on both polymers were different than on glass. Very thin layers (<30Å nominal thickness) of plasma deposited silicon nitride films on polycarbonate and glass produced flat, smooth surfaces, with rms roughness of ≈0.5 nm. On the PET substrates, the nitride growth began with broad, thin deposits and developed a coarse, large-grained structure as growth progressed. With exposure to a NH3 + N2 plasma, the glass and PET surfaces showed detectable changes in surface roughness, which are discussed below. These results demonstrate that plasma-deposited insulators nucleate and grow differently on plastic substrates than on glass, which has implications for electronic devices fabricated directly on plastics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tannas, L. E. Jr., Proc. IEEE 82, 499 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Venables, J. A., Spiller, G. D. T., and Hanbticken, M., Rep. Prog. Phys. 47, 399 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Franz, H., Ceram. Engr. Sci. Proc. 16, 221 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Choi, W.-K., Koh, S.-K., and Jung, H.-J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 2366 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Vallon, S., Dévillon, B., Poncin-Epaillard, F., Klemberg-Sapieha, J., and Martinu, L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 3194 (1996).Google Scholar
6. France, R. M. and Short, R. D., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 93, 3173 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Cueff, R., Baud, G., Besse, J. P., Jacquet, M., and Benmalek, M., J. Adhesion 42, 249 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Cho, J.-S., Choi, W.-K., Jung, H.-J., and Koh, S.-K., J. Mater. Res. 12, 277 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Minami, T., Sato, H., Nanto, H., and Takata, S., Thin Solid Films 176, 277 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Mohri, M., Kakinuma, H., Sakamoto, M., and Sawai, H., Japan. J. Appl. Phys. p.229, L1932 (1990).Google Scholar