Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:37:31.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Separated Anode Experiment to Measure Gas Transport and Methane Reforming within Solid-Oxide Fuel Cell Anodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2012

Amy E. Richards
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Neal P. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Huayang Zhu
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Robert J. Kee
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Get access

Abstract

Solid-oxide fuel cell (SOFC) performance depends greatly upon electrode design. The composite anode plays a critical role in fuel reforming, especially when hydrocarbons are included in the fuel mixture. Because direct observation of fuel reforming in a functioning SOFC is difficult, if not impossible, an alternative experimental configuration is needed to evaluate anode performance. The Separated Anode Experiment (SAE) is designed to isolate and study porous-media transport and heterogeneous reforming chemistry in SOFC anodes. Although the experiment does not incorporate a dense electrolyte membrane or a cathode, it is configured to replicate important aspects of anode behavior in a fully operational SOFC. The experiment is also designed to facilitate model-based interpretation of the results. Comparisons of two significantly different anode structures are used to illustrate the experimental and modeling capabilities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Richards, A.E., McNeeley, M.G., Kee, R.J., and Sullivan, N.P., J. Power Sources 196, 1001010018 (2011).Google Scholar
2. Hecht, E.S., Gupta, G.K., Zhu, H., Dean, A.M., Kee, R.J., Maier, L., and Deutschmann, O., Appl. Cat. A-Gen 295, 4051 (2005).Google Scholar
3. Kim, T., Liu, G., Boaro, M., Lee, S.-I., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Al-Madhi, O.H., and Dabbousi, B.O., J. Power Sources 155, 231238 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Bastidas, D.M., Tao, S., and Irvine, J.T.S., J. Materials Chem. 16, 16031605 (2006).Google Scholar
5. Pillai, M., Kim, I., Bierschenk, D., and Barnett, S.A., J. Power Sources 185, 10861093 (2008).Google Scholar
6. Yang, L., Wang, S., Blinn, K., Liu, M., Lie, Z., Cheng, Z., and Liu, M., Science 326, 126129 (2009).Google Scholar
7. Lin, Y., Zhan, Z., Liu, J., and Barnett, S.A., Solid State Ionics 176, 18271835 (2005).Google Scholar
8. Tucker, M.C. J. Power Sources 195, 45704582 (2010).Google Scholar
9. Franco, T., Schibinger, K., Ilhan, Z., Schiller, G., and Venskutonis, A., ECS Trans. 7, 771–80 (2007).Google Scholar
10. Storjohann, D., Daggett, J., Sullivan, N.P., Zhu, H., Kee, R.J., Menzer, S., and Beeaff, D., J. Power Sources 193, 706712 (2009).Google Scholar
11. Swartzlander, R. and Coors, W.G., U.S. Patent No. 20070176332 (2007).Google Scholar
12. Hendriksen, P.V., Koch, S., Mogensen, M., Liu, Y.L., and Larsen, P.H. in SOFC VIX, edited by Singhal, S.C. and Dokiya, M., (Electrochem. Soc. Proc. Series, 2003) pp. 11471157.Google Scholar
13. Mason, E. and Malinauskas, A., Gas Transport in Porous Media: The Dusty-Gas Model, (American Elsevier, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
14. Zhu, H., Kee, R.J., Janardhanan, V.M., Deutschmann, O., and Goodwin, D.G., J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, A2427A2440 (2005).Google Scholar
15. Janardhanan, V.M. and Deutschmann, O., J. Power Sources 162, 11921202 (2006).Google Scholar