Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:38:44.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual Stress Determination and Subsurface Microstructure in Ground and Polished Alumina/Silicon Carbide Nanocomposites and Monolithic Alumina Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

H.Z. Wu ,
S.G. Roberts ,
A.J. Winn  and
B. Derby
H.Z. Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, K
S.G. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, K
A.J. Winn
Affiliation:
Manchester Materials Science Centre, Grosvenor Street, Manchester M1 7HS, K
B. Derby
Affiliation:
Manchester Materials Science Centre, Grosvenor Street, Manchester M1 7HS, K
Get access

Abstract

The surface residual stress state induced by grinding and polishing an alumina/silicon carbide nanocomposite and monolithic alumina has been investigated using Hertzian indentation and fluorescence spectroscopy. Specimens were ground and then polished with diamond slurry with grit sizes ranging between 8 μm and 1 μm. The results show that the surface residual stress state in the nanocomposites is more sensitive to surface treatment than that in the monolithic alumina. Surfaces of both ceramics were examined in cross-section by TEM and direct observations were made of the plastic deformation induced by different surface treatments. There is a change in the predominant deformation micromechanism from twinning in the alumina to dislocation generation in the nanocomposites.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 581: Symposium F – Nanophase & Nanocomposite Materials II , 1999 , 303
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wu, H.Z., Lawrence, C.W., Roberts, S.G. and Derby, B., Acta Mater., 46, 839 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Chou, I.A., Chan, H.M. and Harmer, M.P., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 78, 567 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Yallee, R.B., Andrew, M.C. and Young, R.J., J. Mater. Sci., 31, 3349 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Wu, H.Z., Titchmarsh, J., Roberts, S.G. and Derby, B., in this proceedings.Google Scholar
5. Roberts, S.G., Lawrence, C.W., Bisrat, Y., Warren, P.D. and Hill, D.A., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 82, 1809 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Warren, P.D., J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 15, 201 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Grabneer, L., J. Appl. Phys., 49, 580 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Yalee, R.B., PhD Thesis, UMIST, 1997.Google Scholar
9. Heuer, A.H., Phil. Mag., 13, 379 (1966).Google Scholar
10. Inkson, B.J., Acta Mater. in press (1999).Google Scholar