Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T02:25:45.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reliable Estimates of Quasi-Particle Energies and Exci-Tonic Effects in Clusters Through Discrete-Variational-Method Total Energy Calculations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Giancarlo Cappellini ,
Francesco Casula  and
Friedhelm Bechstedt
Giancarlo Cappellini
Affiliation:
INFM and Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università di Cagliari, Italy
Francesco Casula
Affiliation:
INFM and Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università di Cagliari, Italy
Friedhelm Bechstedt
Affiliation:
FSU, Physikalisch-Astronomische Fakultät, Jena, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Self-energy corrections to the DFT-LDA HOMO-LUMO gap for clusters have been calculated through an efficient method based on ΔSCF theory. Total energies for the clusters are obtained via discrete variational method (DVM). Good results in comparison with experiments and available theoretical data for the sodium tetramer Na4 and C60 have been obtained. The localization properties of DVM basis-functions play a fundamental role in obtaining the above results with a strongly reduced computational effort in comparison with ab-initio schemes. For the two systems under study an estimate of the first excitonic transition energy is also given.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 491: Symposium R – Tight Binding Approach to Computational Materials Science , 1997 , 191
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jones, R.O. and Gunnarson, O., Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 689 (1989)Google Scholar
2. Hybertsen, M.S., Louie, S.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1418 (1985); Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390Google Scholar
3. Godby, R.W., Schlüter, M., Sham, L.J., Phys. Rev. 37, 10159 (1988)Google Scholar
4. Ellis, D.E. and Painter, G.S., Phys. Rev. B 2, 2887 (1970);Google Scholar
Jinlong, Yang, Kelin, Wang, Casula, F., Mula, G., Phys. Rev. 47, 4025 (1993);Google Scholar
Jinlong, Yang, Toigo, F., and Kelin, Wang, Phys. Rev. 50, 7915 (1994); and references thereinGoogle Scholar
5. Cappellini, G., Bechstedt, F., Bosin, A.., Casula, F., Phys. Sta. Sol.(b) 189, 153 (1995)Google Scholar
6. Cappellini, G., Casula, F., Yang, Jinlong, Bechstedt, F., Phys. Rev. 56, 3628 (1997)Google Scholar
7. Onida, G., Reining, L., Godby, R.W., Del Sole, R., Andreoni, W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 818 (1995)Google Scholar