Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T13:04:29.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Quantitative Study of the Adhesion Between Copper, Barrier and Organic Low-K Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

F. Lanckmans
Affiliation:
also at E.E. Dept., K.U.-Leuven, Belgium
S. H. Brongersma
Affiliation:
IMEC Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
I. Varga
Affiliation:
IMEC Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
H. Bender
Affiliation:
IMEC Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
E. Beyne
Affiliation:
IMEC Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
K. Maex
Affiliation:
also at E.E. Dept., K.U.-Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The adhesion between several materials implemented in Cu/low-k integration is studied. Adhesion issues at different interfaces are important with regard to the reliability of back-end processing. Layered test structures are processed to study different interfaces. A tangential shear tester allows quantifying the adhesion force at the interface and provides a relative measurement to compare various materials. Failed interfaces are analyzed using auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Among all studied structures, the strongest interface is seen between a barrier (Ti(N), Ta(N), WxN) and Cu. A weaker interface proves to be between a low-k dielectric and Cu. However, the presence of a barrier increases the adhesion. The weakest interface occurs between an oxide cap and the low-k material, with a lower adhesion when the low-k material is fluorinated. The low-k/cap oxide interface forms a critical issue with regard to Cu/low-k integration processing such as chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). All test structures show no significant degradation of the adhesion after a thermal cycle up to 400°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Lee, W.W. and Ho, P.S., MRS Bulletin, 22, No. 10, p. 1923 (1997).10.1557/S0883769400034151Google Scholar
[2] Pulker, H.K., Perry, A.J., Berger, R., Surface Technology, 14, 2530 (1991)10.1016/0376-4583(81)90005-4Google Scholar
[3] Wilson, S.R., Tracy, C.J., Freeman, J.L. Jr., Handbook of Multilevel Metallization for Integrated Circuits, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey, USA (1993)Google Scholar
[4] Peden, C., Kidd, K.B., Shinn, N.D., Metal/metal-oxide interfaces: A surface science approach to the study of adhesion, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A9 (3), p. 1518–25 (1991)10.1116/1.577656Google Scholar
[5] Chang, C.-A., Kim, Y.-K. and Schrott, A.G., Adhesion of Metals to Thin-Film Fluorocarbon Polymers, J. Vac. Sci. Tech., Vol. 8, No.4, p. 3304–9 (1990)10.1116/1.576583Google Scholar
[6] Alptekin, A., Czeremuszkin, G., Martinu, L., Meunier, M., M, Direnzo, Low-Diel. Const. Mat. II. Symp. Mater. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, ix+208, p. 7984 (1997)Google Scholar