Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-28T08:05:30.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Process Analysis of AP-CVD of Silicon Carbide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

K. Rottner
Affiliation:
University of Erlangen, Institute of Applied Physics, Germany
R. Helbig
Affiliation:
University of Erlangen, Institute of Applied Physics, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The growth of SiC epilayers by atmospheric pressure CVD (AP-CVD) is influenced by many chemical gas phase reactions and transport phenomena, and is difficult to study directly due to the high growth temperatures (up to 2100 K). To grow epilayers of good quality, it is necessary to control the silicon and carbon supply, each affected by different mechanisms. The use of graphite as the susceptor material causes a remarkable change in the carbon balance due to reactions between the graphite and the hydrogen carrier gas. This graphite-hydrogen reaction enriches the gas phase with carbon and above a certain critical temperature it is impossible to control the Si:C-ratio in the gas phase by a variation of the carbon containing input gas. The silicon supply is usually treated as transport through a stagnant layer in the gas phase determined by the transport properties of the carrier gas and the temperature gradient in the reactor. A numerical solution of the flow-equations in the reactor shows that the flow characteristics and temperature gradients in the reactor are hardly affected by the gas flow velocity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Ziegler, G., Lanig, P., Theis, D. and Weyrich, D., IEEE Tram. Elecon. Devices 30 (1983) p. 277 Google Scholar
2 Karmann, S., Suttrop, W., Schöner, A., Schadt, M., Haberstroh, C., Engelbrecht, F., Helbig, R., Pensi, G., Stein, R.A., Leibenzeder, S.. J. Appl. Phys. 72 (1992) p. 5437 Google Scholar
3 Durst, F., Kadinski, L., Perie, M., Schäfer, M., J. Cryst. Growth, 125 (1992) p. 612 Google Scholar
4 Karmann, S., PhD-thesis, Erlangen (1992)Google Scholar
5 Minagwa, S., Gatos, H.C., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 10 (1971), p.1680 Google Scholar
6 Kimoto, T., Nishino, S., Yoo, W.S., Matsunami, H., J. Appl. Phys 73 (1993) p. 726 Google Scholar
7 Clarke, J.T. and Fox, B.R., J. Chem. Phys. 46 (1967) p. 827 Google Scholar
8 Duff, R.E. and Bauer, S.H, J. Chem. Phys. 36 (1962) p. 1745 Google Scholar
9 Harris, J.M., Gatos, H.C.. Witt, A.F., J. Electrochem. Soc.: Solid State Science 2 (1971) p. 338 Google Scholar
10 Allendorf, M.D., J. Electrochem. Soc: Solid State Science, 140, (1993) p. 74 Google Scholar
11 Edmond, J.A., Waltz, D.G., Brueckner, S., Kong, H.S., Palmour, J.W., Carter, C.H. Jr, Proc Ist Int. High Temperature Electronic Conf, Albuquerque, New Mexico 1992, p. 500 Google Scholar
12 Choyke, W.J., Pensi, G., Physikal. Blaetter 47 (1991), p. 212 Google Scholar
13 Ruff, M., accepted for publication in Proc. IEEE, Electron, devices.Google Scholar