Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T16:26:35.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mbe Growth and Characterization of GaAs thin Films on SiGe Buffer Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

S.M. Prokes ,
W.F. Tseng ,
B.R. Wilkins ,
H. Dietrich  and
A. Christou
S.M. Prokes
Affiliation:
ONT/NRL Post-Doctoral Fellow
W.F. Tseng
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375–5000
B.R. Wilkins
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375–5000
H. Dietrich
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375–5000
A. Christou
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375–5000
Get access

Abstract

Epitaxial SiGe buffers have been formed by the implantation of 74Ge+ ions into Si(100)4° to <011> substrates. The implants were made at 150keV to a dose of 1×1017 /cm2 . The epitaxial layers were characterized by Rutherford backscattering, Raman spectroscopy, and electroreflectance and were found to be 300Å thick having on average a composition of Si0 . 35 Ge0.65. GaAs layers were then grown on these substrates by molecular beam epitaxy, using the standard two-step growth process. The results from Auger, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Cross-sectional TEM indicate a lower defect production and propagation in these samples, compared to those grown directly on Si.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 116 , 1988 , 167
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Harris, J.S. Jr., Koch, S.M., and Rosrner, S.J., Materials Research Society Proceedings, 91 (1987) 3.Google Scholar
2 Kroemer, H., J. Cryst. Growth 81 (1987) 193.Google Scholar
3 Fischer, R.J., Chand, N.C., Knopp, W.F., Morkoc, H., Erickson, L.P., and Youngman, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47 (1985) 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Metze, G.M., Choi, H.K., and Tsaur, B.Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45 (1984) 1107.Google Scholar
5 Fischer, R., Morkoc, H., Neumann, D. A., Zabel, H., Choi, C., Otsuka, N., Longerbone, M., and Erickson, L.P., J. Appl. Phys.1 60 (1986) 1640.Google Scholar
6 Miller, D.L. and Harris, J.S. Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 37 (1980) 1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Pukite, P.R. and Cohen, P.I., J. Cryst. Growth 81 (1987) 214.Google Scholar
8 Tsaur, B.Y., J.Fan, C.C., and Gale, R.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 38 (1981) 779.Google Scholar
9 Fathy, D., Holland, O.W., and White, C.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 (1987) 1337.Google Scholar
10 Prokes, S.M., Glembocki, O.J., Donovan, E.P., Stahlbush, R., Carlos, W.E., Dietrich, H., and Christou, A., SPIE Proceedings, Newport Beach, CA (1988) to be published.Google Scholar
11 Doolittle, L.R., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B9 (1983) 344.Google Scholar
12 Feldman, D.W., Ashkin, M., and Parker, J.H. Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 (1966) 1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Kline, J.S., Pollak, F.H., and Cardona, M., Helvetica Physica Acta 41 (1968) 968.Google Scholar
14 Pearsall, T.P., Pollak, F.H., Bean, J.C., and Hull, R., Phys. Rev B33 (1989) 33.Google Scholar