Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:10:34.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Microstructure on Aggressive Chemical Mechanical Planarization Processes for Thick Copper Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Patrick J. Andersen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Boise State University, Materials Science and Engineering, 1910 University Drive, Boise ID 83725, United States
Megan Frary
Affiliation:
[email protected], Boise State University, Materials Science and Engineering , 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725, United States
Get access

Abstract

Novel die-stacking schema using through-wafer vias may require thick electrodeposited copper and aggressive first-step chemical mechanical planarization (CMP). However, the effect of microstructural parameters, including surface orientation and grain size, on the CMP behavior of thick electrodeposited copper is not well understood. Here we explore the relationship be-tween the surface orientation of copper grains and local CMP removal parameters using electron backscatter diffraction and topography correlation techniques. In the present work, solid copper disks are studied which are annealed to produce samples with differing grain sizes. In addition, aggressive CMP is performed on copper films (30 μm) electrodeposited on silicon. At the bulk level, the slurry composition is found to have the greatest effect on the removal rate and surface roughness. At the microstructural level, the nature of the grain boundaries (e.g. coincidence site lattice (CSL) vs. non-CSL boundaries) is shown to impact the depth of grooving at the grain boundaries. A relationship between surface orientation and local removal rate is found.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Moll, A.J., Knowlton, W.B., Oxford, R., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 970, Y01 (2006).Google Scholar
2 Miranda, P.A., Imonigie, J.A., Moll, A. J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 153, G211–G217 (2006).Google Scholar
3 Ni, C., Hall, I.W., Thomas, T. M., So, J.K., Quanci, J., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37, 24462448 (2004).Google Scholar
4 Riege, S.P., Thompson, C.V., Scripta Mater. 41, 403408 (1999).Google Scholar
5 Watts, D.K., Chikamori, Y., Khomana, T., Kimura, N., Mishima, K., Hongo, A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 671, M3.1 (2001).Google Scholar
6 Sutton, A.P., Balluffi, R.W., Interfaces in Crystalline Materials. 1995: Oxford.Google Scholar