Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:23:35.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Situ Synchrotron X-ray Absorption Experiments and Modelling of the Growth Rates of Electrochemically Deposited ZnO Nanostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Bridget Ingham ,
Benoit N. Illy ,
Jade R. Mackay ,
Stephen P. White ,
Shaun C. Hendy  and
Mary P. Ryan
Bridget Ingham
Affiliation:
[email protected], Industrial Research Limited, Nanotechnology Platform, 69 Gracefield Road, Lower Hutt, N/A, New Zealand
Benoit N. Illy
Affiliation:
[email protected], Imperial College London, Department of Materials, London, SW7 2BP, United Kingdom
Jade R. Mackay
Affiliation:
[email protected], Victoria University of Wellington, MacDiarmid Institute, School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Wellington, N/A, New Zealand
Stephen P. White
Affiliation:
[email protected], Industrial Research Limited, Lower Hutt, N/A, New Zealand
Shaun C. Hendy
Affiliation:
[email protected], Industrial Research Limited, Lower Hutt, N/A, New Zealand
Mary P. Ryan
Affiliation:
[email protected], Imperial College London, Department of Materials, London, SW7 2BP, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

ZnO is known to produce a wide variety of nanostructures that have enormous scope for optoelectronic applications. Using an aqueous electrochemical deposition technique, we are able to tightly control a wide range of deposition parameters (Zn2+ concentration, temperature, potential, time) and hence the resulting deposit morphology. By simultaneously conducting synchrotron x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) experiments during the deposition, we are able to directly monitor the growth rates of the nanostructures, as well as providing direct chemical speciation of the films. In situ experiments such as these are critical to understanding the nucleation and growth of such nanostructures.

Recent results from in situ XAS synchrotron experiments demonstrate the growth rates as a function of potential and Zn2+ concentration. These are compared with the electrochemical current density recorded during the deposition, and the final morphology revealed through ex situ high resolution electron microscopy. The results are indicative of two distinct growth regimes, and simultaneous changes in the morphology are observed.

These experiments are complemented by modelling the growth of the rods in the transport-limited case, using the Nernst-Planck equations in 2 dimensions, to yield the growth rate of the volume, length, and radius as a function of time.

Keywords

nanostructureelectrochemical synthesisZn
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1017 , 2007 , 1017-DD12-16
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wan, Q., Li, Q.H., Chen, Y.J., Wang, T.H., He, X.L., Li, J.P. and Lin, C.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 (2004) 3654.Google Scholar
2. Arnold, M.S., Avouris, P., Pan, Z.W. and Wang, Z.L., J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003), 659.Google Scholar
3. Law, M., Greene, L.E., Johnson, J.C., Saykally, R. and Yang, P.D., Nat. Mater. 4 (2005), 455.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, J., Yan, H., Yang, P. and Saykally, R., J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003), 8816.Google Scholar
5. Kadota, M. and Miura, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41 (2002), 3281.Google Scholar
6. Wei, Q., Meng, G., An, X., Hao, Y. and Zhang, L., Nanotechnology 16 (2005), 2561.Google Scholar
7. Wang, L.S., Zhang, X.Z., Zhao, S.Q., Zhou, G.Y., Zhou, Y.L. and Qi, J.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 (2005), 024108.Google Scholar
8. Lakshmi, B.B., Dorhout, P.K. and Martin, C.R., Chem. Mater. 9 (1997), 857.Google Scholar
9. Park, J.Y., Lee, D.J., Yun, Y.S., Moon, J.H., Lee, B.T. and Kim, S.S., J. Cryst. Growth 276 (2005), 158.Google Scholar
10. Kato, H., Sano, M., Miyamoto, K. and Yao, T., J. Cryst. Growth 237–239 (2002), 538.Google Scholar
11. Okada, T., Agung, B.H. and Nakata, Y., Appl. Phys. A 79 (2004), 1417.Google Scholar
12. Peulon, S. and Lincot, D., J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 (1998), 864.Google Scholar
13. Izaki, M. and Omi, T., J. Electrochem. Soc. 143 (1996)) L53.Google Scholar
14. Fahoumea, M., Maghfoula, O., Aggoura, M., Hartitib, B., Chraïbic, F. and Ennaouic, A., Solar En. Mat. Solar Cells 90 (2006), 1437.Google Scholar
15. Goux, A., Pauporte, T., Chivot, J. and Lincot, D., Electrochim. Acta 50 (2005), 2239.Google Scholar
16. Pauporte, T. and Lincot, D., Electrochim. Acta 45 (2000), 3345.Google Scholar
17. Peulon, S. and Lincot, D., J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 (1998), 864.Google Scholar
18. Cembrero, J., Elmanouni, A., Hartiti, B., Mollar, M. and Mari, B., Thin Solid Films 451-452 (2004), 198.Google Scholar
19. Lee, J. and Tak, Y., Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 4 (2001)) C63.Google Scholar
20. Weng, J., Zhang, Y., Han, G., Zhang, Y., Xu, L., Xu, J., Huang, X. and Chen, K., Thin Solid Films 478 (2005), 25.Google Scholar
21. Oblonsky, L.J., Ryan, M.P. and Isaacs, H.S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 (1998), 1922.Google Scholar