Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:45:44.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Situ Attenuated Total Reflection FTIR Spectroelectrochemistry Of Polybenzimidazobenzophenanthroline (BBL)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Teketel Yohannes
Affiliation:
Physical Chemistry, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergestraße 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
H. Neugebauer
Affiliation:
Physical Chemistry, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergestraße 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
Niyazi S. Sariciftci
Affiliation:
Physical Chemistry, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergestraße 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
S. Yi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0166, USA
Samson A. Jenekhe
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0166, USA
Get access

Abstract

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is a powerful method to determine the doping induced structural changes and electronic band structure modifications of conjugated polymer films. Here, we report in situ attenuated total reflection (ATR) FTIR spectroelectrochemical results of reduction reactions (n-doping) of the conjugated ladder polymer polybenzimidazophenanthroline, BBL. The ATR-FTIR spectra are recorded in situ during continuous potential cycling of a BBL coated germanium reflection element in a three electrode spectroelectrochemical cell. The spectra and the structural changes during the reduction (n-doping) of the polymer film at different electrode potentials are presented. In contrast to most of the other conjugated polymers, this polymer shows four reversible redox reactions during n-doping, corresponding to various forms of BBL with different conductivities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Orata, D. and Buttry, D.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109, 3574 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Genies, E.M. and Lapkowski, M., J. Electroanal. Chem., 236, 199 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Kessel, R., Hansen, G., and Schultze, J.W., Ber. Bunsenges, Phys. Chem., 92, 710 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Barbero, C., Miras, M.C., Haas, O., and Kötz, R., J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 669 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Neugebauer, H. and Ping, Z., Mikrochim. Acta [Suppl.], 14, 125 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Neugebauer, H., Macromol. Symp., 94, 61 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Zagorska, M., Pron, A., and Lefrant, S., Spectroelectrochemistry and Spectroscopy of Conducting Polymers, Handbook of Organic Conductive Molecules and Polymers, ed. Nalwa, H. S., (Wiley, Chichester, 1997), Vol. 3, pp. 183218.Google Scholar
8. Jenekhe, S.A. and Johnson, P.O., Macromolecules, 23, 4419 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Zoppo, M. Del, Castiglioni, C., Zuliani, P., and Zerbi, G., Molecular and Electronic Structure and Nonlinear Optics of Polyconjugated Materials from Their Vibrational Spectra, Handbook of Conducting Polymers, ed. Skotheim, T.A., Elsenbaumer, R.L., and Reynolds, J.R. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998), pp. 765822.Google Scholar