Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:00:04.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved MOCVD Growth of GaAs on Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

R.M. Lum ,
J.K. Klingert ,
B.A. Davidson  and
M.G. Lamont
R.M. Lum
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel, N.J. 07733
J.K. Klingert
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel, N.J. 07733
B.A. Davidson
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, N.J. 07974
M.G. Lamont
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, N.J. 07974
Get access

Abstract

In the direct growth of GaAs on Si by MOCVD the overall quality of the heteroepitaxial film is controlled to a large extent by the growth parameters of the initial GaAs buffer layer. We have investigated the structural properties of this layer using Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS) and X-ray double crystal diffractometry. The crystallinity of the buffer layer was observed to improve with increasing layer thickness in the range 10–100nm, and then to rapidly degrade for thicker layers. High temperature (750°C) annealing of the buffer layers resulted in considerable reordering of all but the thicker (>200 nm) layers. Alteration of the usual GaAs/Si growth sequence to include an in-situ anneal of the buffer layer after growth interruption yielded GaAs films with improved structural, optical and electrical properties.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 91: Symposium A – Heteroepitaxy on Silicon II , 1987 , 125
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Akiyama, M., Kawarada, Y. and Kaminishi, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23, L843 (1984).Google Scholar
[2] Lum, R.M., Klingert, J.K. and Dutt, B.V., J. Cryst. Growth 75, 421 (1986).Google Scholar
[3] Hirsch, P.B., Progress in Metal Physics, edited by Chalmers, B. and King, R. (Pergamon, New York, N.Y., 21956), Chap. 6.Google Scholar
[4] Hull, R. and Fischer-Colbrie, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 851 (1987).Google Scholar
[5] Chand, N., People, R., Baiocchi, F.A., Wecht, K.W. and Cho, A.Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 815 (1986).Google Scholar
[6] Lee, J.W., Shichijo, H., Tsai, H.L. and Matyi, R.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 31 (1987).Google Scholar
[7] Zemon, S., Shastry, S.K., Norris, P., Jagnnath, C. and Lambert, G., Solid State Comm. 58, 457 (1986).Google Scholar
[8] Harris, T.D. and Lamont, M.G., private communication.Google Scholar
[9] Macrander, A.T., Chu, S.N.G., Strege, K.E., Bloemeke, A.F. and Johnston, W.D. Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 615 (1984).Google Scholar
[10] Hutson, A.R., J. Appl. 60, 1038 (1986).Google Scholar
[11] Lee, J.W., in Heteroepitaxy on Silicon, edited by Fan, J.C.C. and Poate, J.M. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986), p. 29.Google Scholar