Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:20:57.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Helical Resonator Plasma Oxidation of Amorphous and Polycrystalline Silicon for Flat Panel Displays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Sita R. Kaluri
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa 18105
Robert S. Howell
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa 18015
Dennis W. Hess
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa 18105
Miltiadis K. Hatalis
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa 18015
Get access

Abstract

A low temperature process for the oxidation of amorphous and polycrystalline silicon was studied using a helical resonator plasma source. Constant current anodization of amorphous silicon was performed at 350°C and 30 mtorr in an oxygen plasma. Oxidation rate data were analyzed by both parabolic and power law expressions: parabolic rate coefficient B = 23.45 nm2/min and power law rate coefficients α = 0.3807 and C* = 7.3 nm/minα. Oxidation at substrate floating conditions yielded thin oxides; the growth rate saturated after 20 mins, at a thickness of about 10 nm. For TFr fabrication, a two layer oxide was used. The first layer was grown by plasma oxidation to a thickness of about 10 nm to ensure a good interface, and the second layer deposited by PECVD to the final thickness of 35 nm. Electrical properties of control oxides grown on c-Si at the same conditions were promising, with a fixed oxide charge of 1.98 × 1011 charges/cm2 and a mean breakdown field of 5.3 MV/cm after post metallization anneal. The TF's had an average effective electron mobility of 31.1 V/cm2 and an average threshold voltage of 4.6 V.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Hatalis, M., Kung, J., Kanicki, J., and Bright, A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 182, p.357 (1990).Google Scholar
2) Itsumi, M. and Kishi, K, J. Electrochem Soc., 140, p.3210 (1993).Google Scholar
3) Flamm, D. L., Ibbotson, D. E. and Johnson, W. L.U.S. Patent No. 4,918,031, April 17, 1990.Google Scholar
4) Cook, J. M., Ibbotson, D. E., Foo, P. D. and Flamm, D. L., J. Vac. Sci Tech., A8, p.1820 (1990).Google Scholar
5) Cook, J. M., Ibbotson, D. E. and Flamm, D. L., J. Vac. Sci. Tech., B8, p.1 (1990).Google Scholar
6) Carl, D. A., Hess, D. W., Lieberman, M. A., Nguyen, T. D., and Gronsky, R., J. AppL Phys. 70, p. 3301 (1991).Google Scholar
7) Wolters, D. R. and Zegers-van Duynhoven, A. T. A., J. Appl. Phys. 65, p. 5126 (1989).Google Scholar
8) Wolters, D. R. and Zegers-van Duynhoven, A. T. A., J. Appl. Phys. 65, p. 5134 (1989).Google Scholar
9) Bright, A. A., Batey, J. and Tierney, E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, p. 619 (1991).Google Scholar