Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:17:13.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy Levels of Defects in a-Si:H From Optical and Electrical Characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. Globus*
Affiliation:
EE Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two novel characterization techniques for hydrogenated silicon thin films have been recently proposed which show promise in providing critical feedback for evaluating materials and monitoring the device fabrication process. The first technique is the optical interference spectroscopy for a quick non-destructive measurement of absorption coefficient and refractive index spectra of amorphous- and poly-Si thin films in a wide range of the incident photon energies (0.5–3.5 eV) [1]. By using this technique, the absorption related to defects in the subgap energy region has been determined for device quality thin films. The second technique is the novel version of the field effect conductivity (FEC) method for the direct density-of-states (DOS) determination from analysis of thin film transistor (TFT) quasi-static transfer characteristics [2]. This sensitive, fast, and easy to use, method makes it possible to resolve fine-scale features in the midgap DOS of a-Si:H. In this work, data from two methods of spectroscopy are analyzed together. Very close correlation of results is demonstrated which provides a unique opportunity to identify midgap defect states and to understand the fundamental physics of hydrogenated silicon films. The energy map of defect states in the upper half of a-Si:H bandgap is presented. These results permits to use TFT transfer characteristics and optical interference technique measurements as effective tools to control the quality of TFF manufacturing process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Globus, T., Gildenblat, G., Fonash, S., MRS Proc., 406, p.313, 1996.Google Scholar
2. Globus, T., Gelmont, B., Sun, Q.L., Mattauch, R.J., to be published in 1996 MRS Spring Meeting Proc., Symp. A, San Francisco, CA, 1996.Google Scholar
3. Chen, L., Tauc, J., Kocka, J., and Stuchlik, J., Phys. Rev. B46, p. 2050 (1992).Google Scholar
4. O'Connor, P. and Tauc, J., Phys. Rev. B25, 2748 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Street, R. A., Phys Rev. B21, p.5775 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Street, R. A., and Biegelsen, D. K., Solid St. Commun. 33, 1159 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Pierz, K., Fuhs, W. and Mell, H., Philosophical Magazine B, 63, 123 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Hishikawa, Y., Nakamura, N., Tsuda, S., Nakano, S., Kishi, Y., and Kuwano, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 1008 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Maley, N., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 768 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Hall, J. F. and Ferguson, W. F. C., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 45, 714 (1955).Google Scholar
11. Globus, T. R., Gelmont, B. L., Geiman, K. I., Kondrashov, V. A., and Matveenko, A. V., Zh. Exsp. Teor. Fiz. 80, 1926 (1981) [Sov. Phys. JETF 53 (5), 1000 (1981)].Google Scholar
12. Globus, T., Slade, H. C., Shur, M., and Hack, M., MRS Proc. 336, 823 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Tarr, N.G., Pulfrey, D.L., and Iles, P.A., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3926 (1980).Google Scholar
14. Tauc, J., in Optical Properties of Solids, Plenum Press, New-York, p. 128 (1969).Google Scholar
15. Kanicki, J. in Amorphous & Microcrystalline Semiconductor Devices, Vol.2, Ed. Kanicki, J., Artech House, Boston-London, p. 195 (1992).Google Scholar
16. Fuhs, W., in Landolt-Bomstein. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, New Series, edited by Madelung, O., Schultz, M., Weiss, H. (Springer-Verlag Berlin-Heidelberg, Ney-York, Tokyo 1985), Band 17, p.43.Google Scholar