Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:16:32.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficient Electronic Energy Functionals for Tight-Binding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Roger Haydock
Roger Haydock*
Affiliation:
Physics Department and Materials Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403–1274
Get access

Abstract

Generalized functionals are constructed from the exchange-correlation energy by a Legendre transformation which makes the new functionals stationary at the electronic charge density, potential, and wave functions for the ground-state. Using generalized functionals, the density, potential, and wave functions can be independently parameterized and varied to determine the ground-state energy-surface for a system of atoms. This eliminates the computationally awkward steps of constructing densities from wave functions or potentials from densities, and is particularly well suited to parameterizations using tight-binding orbitale together with atomic-like densities and potentials. For each choice of parameters, the only quantities which must be computed are the electron-electron energy for the density, the integral of the potential over the density, and the band structure energy for the wave functions. To second order in the density, potential, and wave functions, the energy for a configuration of atoms is given by the generalized functional evaluated at a superposition of atomic densities, a potential made by stitching together the atomic potentials where they are equal, and atomic wave functions. For more accurate stationary energies the densities, potentials, and wave functions can be improved by one or more conjugate gradient steps.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 491: Symposium R – Tight Binding Approach to Computational Materials Science , 1997 , 35
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Haydock, Roger in Mathematics and its Applications vol. 99. edited by Golden, , Grimmett, , James, , Milton, , and Sen, (Springer, Berlin, 1997), 107–114.Google Scholar
2. Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W., Phys. Rev. 136, 864 (1964).Google Scholar
3. Kohn, W. and Sham, L.J., Phys. Rev. 140, 1133 (1965).Google Scholar
4. Harris, J., Phys. Rev. B 31, 1770 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Foulkes, W.M.C. and Haydock, Roger, Phys. Rev. B 39, 12520 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Wendel, H. and Martin, R.M., Phys. Rev. B 19, 5251 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Jacobsen, K.W., Norskov, J.K., and Puska, M.J., Phys. Rev. B 35, 7423 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Haydock, Roger and Heine, Volker, Comments on Condensed Matter Physics 18, 83 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Gibson, A., Haydock, Roger, and LaFemina, J.P., Phys. Rev. B. 50, 2582 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Blumberg, S. and Haydock, Roger, Phys. Rev. B 45, 1550 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Slater, J.C. and Koster, G.F., Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954).Google Scholar
12. Gibson, A. and Haydock, Roger, Phys. Rev. B. 47, 9229 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Haydock, Roger in Solid State Physics vol. 35, edited by Ehrenreich, H., Seitz, F., and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press, London and New York, 1980), 215–294.Google Scholar
14. Gibson, A., Haydock, Roger, and LaFemina, J.P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10, 2361 (1992).Google Scholar
15. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T., Numerical Recipes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
16. Reitz, J. in Solid State Physics vol. 1, edited by Ehrenreich, H., Seitz, F., and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press, London and New York, 1955).Google Scholar
17. Seitz, F., The Modern Theory of Solids (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1940).Google Scholar
18. Inglesfield, J.E., Mol. Phys. 37, 3 and 889 (1979).Google Scholar
19. Mattheiss, L.F., Phys. Rev. 133, A1399 (1964).Google Scholar
20. Annett, J.F., and Haydock, Roger, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6860 (1986).Google Scholar