Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:34:12.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of VUV and EUV Radiation on Ultra Low-k Materials Damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2013

Oleg Braginsky
Affiliation:
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander Kovalev
Affiliation:
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry Lopaev
Affiliation:
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Yury Mankelevich
Affiliation:
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Olga Proshina
Affiliation:
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana Rakhimova
Affiliation:
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander Rakhimov
Affiliation:
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Anna Vasilieva
Affiliation:
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey Zyryanov
Affiliation:
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail Baklanov
Affiliation:
Interuniversity Microelectronic Centre, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Get access

Abstract

Low-k dielectric films can be substantially damaged during plasma processing. High energy UV and VUV photons emitted by plasma play the key role in damaging the porous low-k films directly or indirectly by stimulating chemical reactions with radicals in plasma and plasma afterglow. The different ULK samples (k: 2.0-2.2, porosity: 30-50%, pore radius: 1-2 nm) were studied by exposing to five radiation sources at various wavelengths (VUV: 193 nm, 147 nm, 104-106 nm, 58.3 nm, and EUV: 13.5 nm). Time-spatial behavior of the ULK damage as a function of photons fluence was studied by FTIR spectroscopy and XRF analysis. It is shown that the degree of damage depends on wavelength of UV light. The major UV damage was observed at the wavelengths below 193 nm. The maximum damage corresponds to 147 nm while the degree of damage at 58.3 nm was much smaller. In the case of organosilicate (OSG) based ULK materials, the degree of damage, as a rule, increases with porosity. Organic low-k materials are damaged more than OSG at 193 nm, but at shorter wavelengths (147, 106, 58.3 and 13.5 nm) they are more stable than OSG. One-dimensional model for radiation absorption and dynamics of CH3 group destruction in ULK films was developed. The cross-sections of photons absorption and photo-stimulated Si-CH3 bond breaking in ULK films for 13.5 -147 nm wavelength range were derived from a combined experimental and modeling study. The obtained values allow to simulate the VUV/EUV induced modifications of low-k materials with different composition, to understand better the mechanisms of plasma damage and to generate ideas for controllable modifications of low-k materials.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baklanov, M. R., de Marneffe, J-F., Shamiryan, D., Urbanowicz, A. M., Shi, H., Rakhimova, T. V., Huang, H., and Ho, P. S., J. Appl. Phys. 113, 041101 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braginsky, O. V., Kovalev, A. S., Lopaev, D. V., Malykhin, E. M., Mankelevich, Yu. A., Rakhimova, T. V., Rakhimov, A. T., Vasilieva, A. N., Zyryanov, S. M., and Baklanov, M. R., J. Appl. Phys. 108, 073303 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Ciofi, I., Carbonell, L., Heylen, N., Van Aelst, J., Baklanov, M. R., Groeseneken, G., Maex, K., and Tőkei, Z., J. Appl. Phys. 104, 034113 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. and Graves, D. B., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 425201 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsumi, T., Fukuda, S., Kadomura, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 2175 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodworth, J. R., Riley, M. E., Amatucci, V. A., Hamilton, T. W. and Aragon, B. P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 19, 45 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolicard, G., Zucconi, J.-M., Drira, I., Spielfieldel, A., nd Feautrier, N., J. Chem. Phys. 106, 10105 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar