Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:17:22.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Several Ingredient Variables on Mechanical Properties of Wood Fiber-Polyolefin Composites Blended in a Thermokinetic Mixer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C. Gonzalez ,
C. M. Clemons ,
G. E. Myers  and
T. M. Harten
C. Gonzalez
Affiliation:
University of Oviedo, 33071-Oviedo, Spain
C. M. Clemons
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53705-2398
G. E. Myers
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53705-2398
T. M. Harten
Affiliation:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King, Cincinnati, OH 45268
Get access

Abstract

We examined the influence of several variables on the mechanical properties of wood fiber-polyolefin composites blended in a thermokinetic mixer. A pure cellulose fiber and fibers from old newspaper provided similar performance in matrices of virgin polypropylene or recycled milk bottles (high density polyethylene). Relative to wood flour, these fibrous fillers led to greater strength and modulus with both plastics, to lower impact energy with polyethylene, and to similar impact energy with polypropylene. Compared with the existing commercial wood flour-polypropylene system, the totally recycled polyethylene-newspaper composite provided equivalent strength and modulus, along with greater notched impact energy. Little difference was seen in composites containing a maleated polypropylene additive in the form of the solid anhydride or the emulsified potassium salt, indicating that the additive acted as a dispersing agent and not as a strong coupling agent.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 266: Symposium LA – Materials Interactions Relevant to Recycling of Wood-Based Materials , 1992 , 127
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Myers, G.E., Chahyadi, I.S., Coberly, C.A., and Ermer, D.S., Intern. J. Polym. Mater. 15, 21–44 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Myers, G.E., Chahyadi, I.S., Gonzalez, C., Coberly, C.A., and Ermer, D.S., Intern. J. Polym. Mater. 15(3,4), 171–186 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Woodhams, R.T., Thomas, G., and Rodgers, D.K., Polym. Eng. Sci. 24 (15), 1166–1171 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Woodhams, R.T., Law, S., and Balatinecz, J.J., in Proceedings, Wood Adhesives Symp., Madison, WI, May 16–18, 1990, pp. 177–182 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Frenken, S., Lyons, D., and Baker, W.E., Preprints ANTEC '91, 40–45 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Olsen, D.J., Preprints ANTEC '91, 1886–1891 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Krzysik, A.M., Youngquist, J.A., Myers, G.E., Chahyadi, I.S., and Kolosick, P.C., in Proceedings, Wood Adhesives Symp., Madison, WI, May 16–18, 1990, pp. 183–189 (1991).Google Scholar
8. American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual Standards, Vol. 08.01, Sec. 8 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Yam, K., Kalyankai, V., Selke, S., and Lai, C., Preprints ANTEC '88, 1809–1811 (1988).Google Scholar