Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:40:37.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Damage and Dopant Profiles Produced by Ultra-Shallow Boron And Arsenic Ion Implants into Silicon at Different Temperatures Characterised by Medium Energy Ion Scattering.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

J. A. van den Berg
Affiliation:
Joule Physics Laboratory, School of Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
D. G. Armour
Affiliation:
Joule Physics Laboratory, School of Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
S. Whelan
Affiliation:
Joule Physics Laboratory, School of Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
M. Werner
Affiliation:
Joule Physics Laboratory, School of Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
E. H. J. Collart
Affiliation:
Applied Materials UK Ltd, Foundry Lane, Horsham, W. Sussex, RH13 5PX.
R. D. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Applied Materials UK Ltd, Foundry Lane, Horsham, W. Sussex, RH13 5PX.
P. Bailey
Affiliation:
CLRC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Cheshire, WA4 4AD, UK.
T. C. Q. Noakes
Affiliation:
CLRC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Cheshire, WA4 4AD, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Medium energy ion scattering (MEIS), operated at sub-nm depth resolution in the double alignment configuration, has been used to examine implant and damage depth profiles formed in Si(100) substrates irradiated with 2.5 keV As+ and 1 keV B+ ions. Samples were implanted at temperatures varying between 150°C, and 300°C to doses ranging from 3X1014 to 2X1016 cm-2. For the As implants the MEIS studies demonstrate the occurrence of effects such as a dopant accommodation linked to the growth in depth of the damage layer, dopant clustering, as well as damage and dopant movement upon annealing. Following epitaxial regrowth at 600°C, approximately half of the As was observed to be in substitutional sites, consistent with the reported formation of AsnV complexes (n≤4), while the remainder became segregated and became trapped within a narrow, 1.1 nm wide layer at the Si/oxide interface

MEIS measurements of the B implants indicate the formation of two distinct damage regions each with a different dependence on implant dose, the importance of dynamic annealing for implants at room temperature and above, and a competing point defect trapping effect at the Si/oxide interface. B+ implantation at low temperature resulted in the formation of an amorphous layer due to the drastic reduction of dynamic annealing processes.

Notably different dopant distributions were measured by SIMS in the samples implanted with As at different temperatures following rapid thermal annealing (RTA) up to 1100°C in an oxidising environment. Implant temperature dependent interactions between defects and dopants are reflected in the transient enhanced diffusion (TED) behaviour of As.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stolk, P., Gossman, H. J., Eaglesham, D. J., Jacobson, D. C., Rafferty, C. S., Gilmer, G. H., Jareiz, M., Poate, J. M., Luftman, H. S. and Hayes, T. E., J. Appl. Phys 81, 6031 (1997) and refs.Google Scholar
2. Cowern, N. E. B. and Rafferty, C. S., MRS Bulletin 25, 39 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Berg, J. A. van den, Zhang, S., Whelan, S., Armour, D. G., Goldberg, R. D., Collart, E. J. H., Bailey, P. and Noakes, T. C. Q., Nucl. Instrum. and Meths B 183, 154 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Berg, J. A. van den, Armour, D.G., Zhang, S., Whelan, S., Armour, D. G., Wang, T.S., Cullis, A. G., Goldberg, R. D., Collart, E. J. H., Bailey, P. and Noakes, T. C. Q., J.Vac. Sci. Technol. B (to be published).Google Scholar
5. Goldberg, R. D., Armour, D. G., Berg, J. A. van den, Knorr, N., Ohno, H., Whelan, S., Zhang, S., Cook, C. E. A. and Foad, M. A., Rev. Sci. Instr. 71 (2), p. 1032, (2000).Google Scholar
6. Tromp, R.M., in Practical Surface Analysis, Vol. 2: Ion and Neutral Spectroscopy, Briggs, D. and Seah, M.P. (eds.), 1992, Wiley, p.577; W. K. Chu, J. W. Mayer, M. Nicolet, “Backscattering Spectrometry”, (Acad. Press, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
7. Biersack, J. P., and Haggmark, L. G., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 174, 257 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Badheka, R., Wadsworth, M., Armour, D. G., Berg, J. A. van den, and Clegg, J. B.. Surface. Interf. Anal. 15, 550 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Badheka, R. and Armour, D. G., Whelan, S. and Berg, J. A. van den, (unpublished results).Google Scholar
10. Berding, M. A. and Sher, A., Phys. Rev. B 58, 3853 (1998).Google Scholar
11. Rousseau, P. M., Griffin, P. B., Fang, W. T. and Plummer, J. D., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 3593 (1998).Google Scholar
12. Nordlund, K., Partyka, P., Zhong, Y., Robinson, I. K., Averback, R. S. and Ehrhart, P., Nucl Instr. and Meth. B 147, 399 (1999).Google Scholar