Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:37:13.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlations Between Structural Characteristics and Process Conditions of HSQ Based Porous Low-k Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Hae-Jeong Lee
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Polymers Division, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA
Eric K. Lin
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Polymers Division, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA
Howard Wang
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Polymers Division, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA
Wen-Li Wu
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Polymers Division, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA
Wei Chen
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Fabrication Materials KCI, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA
Thomas A. Deis
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Fabrication Materials KCI, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA
Get access

Abstract

A novel methodology using a combination of ion scattering, x-ray reflectivity (SXR), and small angle neutron scattering was used to characterize the structure and properties of a hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ) based porous low-k dielectric films after varying process conditions. The dielectric constant and the remaining Si-H fraction (degree of cure) of the samples were varied from 1.5 to 2.2 and from 30 % to 52 %, respectively, by controlling the mass ratio of the solvent and the HSQ resin in the initial solutions and the wet ammonia treatment time. We determined the density depth profile, average mass density, wall density, porosity, average pore size, average wall thickness, pore connectivity and atomic composition. The chemical bond structures were also measured using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The density profile of each porous low-k film was uniform and only two layers were required to fit the experimental SXR data. Higher dielectric constant films show significantly higher wall densities and lower porosities and pore sizes. The measured increases in the wall density with lower Si-H fractions are consistent with the FTIR results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

1. Hawker, C. J., Hedrick, J. L., Miller, R. D., and Volksen, W., MRS Bull., 25(4), 54 (2000).Google Scholar
2. List, R. S., Singh, A., Ralston, A., and Dixit, G., MRS Bull., 22(10), 61 (1997).Google Scholar
3. (a) Gidley, D. W., Frieze, W. E., Dull, T. L., Yee, A. F., Nguyen, C. V., and Yoon, D. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 1282 (2000). (b) F. N. Dultsev, and M. H. Baklanov, Elect. Solid State Lett., 2, 192 (1999). (c) W. L. Wu, W. E. Wallace, E. K. Lin, G. W. Lynn, C. J. Glinka, E. T. Ryan, and H. M. Ho, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 1193 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Certain commercial equipment and materials are identified in this paper in order to specify adequately the experimental procedure. In no case does such identification imply recommendation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology nor does it imply that the material or equipment identified is necessarily the best available for this purpose.Google Scholar
5. Deis, T. A., Saha, C., Moyer, E., Chung, K., and Liu, Y. et al. , Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 612, D5. 18. 1 (2000).Google Scholar
6. The data throughout the manuscript and in the figures are presented along with the standard uncertainty (±) involved in the measurement.Google Scholar
7. Parratt, L. G., Phys. Rev., 95, 359 (1954).Google Scholar
8. Lee, H. J., Lin, E. K., Wu, W. L., Fanconi, B. M., Liou, H. C., Lan, J. K., Cheng, Y. L., Wang, Y. L., Feng, M. S., and Chao, C. G., Proceedings, International Conference, Characterization and Metrology For ULSI Technology, 440 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Santucci, S., Cecilia, A. V. L., Phani, A. R., Alfonsetti, R., Moccia, G., and Biase, M. D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 52 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Debye, P., Anderson, H. R., and Brumberger, H., J. Appl. Phys., 28, 679 (1957).Google Scholar
11. Wu, W. L., Lin, E. K., Jin, C., and Wetzel, J. T., Proceedings of the MRS Spring 2000 Meeting, (2000) in press.Google Scholar
12. Liou, H. C., and Pretzer, J., Thin solid films, 335, 186 (1998).Google Scholar