Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:47:16.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Surface Cleaning Processes for Diamond C(001)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Peter K. Baumann ,
T. P. Humphreys  and
R. J. Nemanich
Peter K. Baumann
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202
T. P. Humphreys
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202
R. J. Nemanich
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202
Get access

Abstract

Two wet chemical cleaning processes (a conventional chromic acid clean and an electrochemical etch) and a H-plasma exposure have been employed to clean natural type lib semiconducting diamond C(001) wafers. The effects of these processes on the diamond surface have been assessed and compared. As evidenced by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), an oxygen free surface could be obtained following annealing to 900°C for the electrochemical process compared to 1050°C for the chromic acid etch. In addition, the technique of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) demonstrated the presence of oriented pits on the surface of samples electrochemically etched for long times at high currents. Furthermore, heteroepitaxial Cu films have been grown on the diamond substrates cleaned by a process as described above. By means of Ultraviolet Photoemission Spectroscopy (UPS) a Schottky barrier height of ΦB≊ 1.0 eV was measured. Furthermore, the presence a negative electron affinity (NEA) has been determined.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 339: Symposium D – Diamond, Silicon Carbide and Nitride Wide Bandgap Semiconductors , 1994 , 69
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Marchywka, M., Pehrsson, P.E., Binari, S.C. and Moses, D., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 140, No. 2(1993) L19. Google Scholar
2. Yang, Y.L., Struck, L.M., Scutcu, L.F. and D'Evelyn, M.P., Thin Solid Films 225, 203 (1993)Google Scholar
3. Thomas, R.E., Rudder, R.A. and Markunas, R.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10, 2451 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Hamza, A.V., Kubiak, G.D. and Stulen, R.H., Surf. Sci. 237, 35 (1990).Google Scholar
5. van der Weide, J., Zhang, Z., Baumann, P.K., Wensell, M.G., Bernholc, J. and Nemanich, R.J., submitted for publication.Google Scholar
6. Muranaka, Y., Yamashita, H. and Miyadera, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 9, 76 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Baumann, P.K., Humphreys, T.P., Nemanich, R.J., Ishibashi, K., Parikh, N.R., Porter, L.M. and Davis, R.F., Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Diamond, Diamondlike and Related Materials, (J. Diamond Rel. Mat., Vol. 3/4–6, 1994) pp. 883–886, in press.Google Scholar
8. Baumann, P.K., Humphreys, T.P., Nemanich, R.J., submitted for publication.Google Scholar
9. Himpsel, F.J., Heimann, P. and Eastman, D.E., Solid State Commun. 36, 631 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Pate, B.B., Spicer, W.E., Ohta, T. and Lindau, I., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 17, 1087 (1980).Google Scholar
11. van der Weide, J. and Nemanich, R.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10, 1940 (1992).Google Scholar
12. van der Weide, J. and Nemanich, R.J., Phys. Rev. B, in press.Google Scholar
13. Schneider, T.P., Cho, J., Chen, Y.L., Mahler, D.H. and Nemanich, R.J., in Surface Chemical Cleaning and Passivation for Semiconductor Processing, edited by Higashi, G.S., Irene, E.A., Ohmi, T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 315, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) pp. 197–209. Google Scholar
14. Rhoderick, E.H. and Williams, R.H., Metal-Semiconductor Contacts (Clarendon, Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar