Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:39:58.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Defects Produced in TEOS Thin Films due to Chemical-Mechanical Polishing (CMP)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

F. B. Kaufman
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center and Semiconductor Research and Development Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. 10598
S. A. Cohen
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center and Semiconductor Research and Development Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. 10598
M. A. Jaso
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center and Semiconductor Research and Development Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. 10598
Get access

Abstract

Time zero breakdown electrical measurements, SIMS, Bias Temperature Stress (BTS), and Triangular Voltage Sweep (TVS) techniques performed on MOS capacitors have been used to characterize two types of defects produced in TEOS thin films subjected to CMP process planarization. Microcracking of the insulator, resulting in degradation in breakdown characteristics, and uptake of K+ ions (from the polishing slurry) are found to occur. These defects are thought to be caused by the chemical and mechanical stress to which the oxide surface is subjected during the CMP process. The effects of polish pad type, non K+ ion containing slurry and post-CMP wet etch steps were all found to influence the extent of damage observed in polished films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Patrick, W.J., Guthrie, W.L., Standley, C.L. and Schiable, P.M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 1778 (1991)Google Scholar
2. Renteln, P., Thomas, M.E. and Pierce, J.M., Proc. Seventh VLSI Interconnection Conference, p.57 (1990)Google Scholar
3. Sivaram, S., Bath, H., Leggett, R., Maury, A., Monnig, K. and Tolles, R., Solid State Tech., p. 87 (1992)Google Scholar
4. Davari, B., Koburger, C.W., Schultz, R. et al., IEDM Tech. Digest p. 61 (1989)Google Scholar
5. Landis, H., Burke, P., Cote, W. et al., Thin Solid Films, 220 1 (1992)Google Scholar
6. Guthrie, W.L., Patrick, W.J., Levine, E. et al., IBM J.of Res. Devel. 36 845 (1992)Google Scholar
7. Ketchen, M., Gallagher, W.J., Pearson, D. et al. , Appl. Phys. Letts., 59 2609 (1991)Google Scholar
8. SRC Topical Research Conference on Chem-Mechanical Polishing for Planarization, M.R. Witty, Editor, September 1992 Google Scholar
9. Cohen, S.A., Jaso, M. A. and Bright, A.A.. J. Electrochem. Soc., 139 3572 (1992)Google Scholar
10. Murarka, S., Ko, S-H, Tomazawa, M., Ding, P-J and Lanford, W. A., presented at 1994 Spring MRS Meeting.Google Scholar
11. Nicollian, E.H. and Brews, J.R., MOS Physics and Technology. New York: Wiley (1982)Google Scholar
12. Defect Density = −ln(Yield)/Capacitor Area, Yield = Percent good means breakdown fields >/ = 6 MV/cm/+=+6+MV/cm>Google Scholar
13. Cohen, S.A. and Kaufman, F.B., to be published.Google Scholar
14. Hirao, K. and Tomazawa, M., J. Am. Ceram. Sot., 70, 377 (1987)Google Scholar
15. Tomazawa, M., Hart, W-T and Lanford, W.A., J. Am. Ceram. Sot., 70, 377 (1987), 74 2573 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Trogolo, J.A. and Rajan, K., J. of Materials Science, 29 4554 (1994)Google Scholar
17. Bache, M.R. and HoUoway, D.G., Glass Tech. 31 126 (1990)Google Scholar
18. Tesar, A.A., Brown, N.J., Taylor, J.R. and StoLz, C.J., Proc of SPIE 1441 154 (1991)Google Scholar
19. Iler, R.K., The Chemistry of Silica, John Wiley and Sons, 1979.Google Scholar
20. Thomas, R. R., Kaufman, F.B., Kixleis, T. and Belsky, R., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
21. Klymko, N.R. and Kaufman, F.B., unpublished.Google Scholar
22. Derbenwick, G.F., J. Appl. Phys. 48 127 (1977).Google Scholar