Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:52:16.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wise Energy Investment Decisions–Not Just [kJ out/kJ in]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Lise Laurin*
Affiliation:
[email protected], EarthShift, Maine, 31 Leach Rd, Kittery, ME, 03904, United States, +1 (207) 439-7693, +1 (207) 439-2223
Get access

Abstract

While the best energy solutions may seem obvious to the LCA community, we often see wind turbines voted down for aesthetics and policy makers leaning toward solutions that show poor return, kilojoule per kilojoule. If we are to move forward with wise energy solutions, we will need to broaden our perspective to include the social impacts that influence policy-makers and communities, creating a decision-system that encompasses both social and environmental impacts.

Starting with LCA and Total Cost Assessment, a case study of a biodiesel facility in Vermont begins to incorporate social goals with reduced environmental impacts. We'll then look at other energy systems and how these decision-making tools might be used to bring policy makers, environmentalists, and communities together making wise energy choices for our future.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Frischknecht, , Rolf, , Jungbluth, , Niels, (2004) “Ecoinvent Overview and Methodology” Published by the Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland, 2004. http://www.ecoinvent.org/fileadmin/documents/en/01_OverviewAndMethodology.pdfGoogle Scholar
2. Jolliet, O, Margni, M, Charles, R, Humbert, S, Payet, J, Rebitzer, G, Rosenbaum, R (2003): IMPACT 2002+: A New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology. Int J LCA 8 (6) 324330 Google Scholar
3. Mulder, , Kenneth, , Matthews, , Allen, , “An Ecological Economic Assessment of a Proposed Biodiesel Industry for the State of Vermontfl, Report Summary for USDA grant NRCS 68-3A75-3-143, Aim 3, December 2004, http://www.uvm.edu/%7Esusagctr/BRDI%20summary.pdf.Google Scholar
4. Laurin, , Lise, , Norris, , Gregory, A., , Trupia, Sabrina, , “Biodiesel in Vermont—the environmental impact and the total cost”, Case Study produced for AIChE, July 2005. http://www.earthshift.com/Biorefinery%20Case%20Study.pdfGoogle Scholar
5. Altschiller, , Howard, , “N.H. musn't wait for EPA to take action on mercury.” Portsmouth Herald, Feb. 16, 2005. http://archive.seacoastonline.com/2005news/02162005/editoria/64817.htmGoogle Scholar