Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:25:26.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultra Shallow Junctions Optimization with Non Doping Species Co-implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Nathalie Cagnat
Affiliation:
[email protected], STMicroelectronics, Ion Implantation R&D, 850, rue Jean Monnet, Crolles, France, 38926, France, Metropolitan
Cyrille Laviron
Affiliation:
[email protected], LETI, CEA-Grenoble, Grenoble, France, 38054, France, Metropolitan
Daniel Mathiot
Affiliation:
[email protected], InESS, Strasbourg, France, 67037, France, Metropolitan
Blandine Duriez
Affiliation:
[email protected], Philips, Crolles, France, 38926, France, Metropolitan
Julien Singer
Affiliation:
[email protected], Philips, Crolles, France, 38926, France, Metropolitan
Romain Gwoziecki
Affiliation:
[email protected], LETI, CEA-Grenoble, Grenoble, France, 38054, France, Metropolitan
Frédéric Salvetti
Affiliation:
[email protected], Philips, Crolles, France, 38926, France, Metropolitan
Benjamin Dumont
Affiliation:
[email protected], STMicroelectronics, Crolles, France, 38926, France, Metropolitan
Arnaud Pouydebasque
Affiliation:
[email protected], Philips, Crolles, France, 38926, France, Metropolitan
Get access

Abstract

The permanent decrease of the transistor size to improve the performances of integrated circuits must be accompanied by a permanent decrease of the depth of the source-drain junctions. At the same time, in order to keep acceptable sheet resistance values, the dopant concentration in the source-drain areas has to be continuously increased. A possible technological way to meet the junction depth and abruptness requirements is to use co-implantation of non doping species with classical implantations, especially for light ions as B or P.

In order to clarify the complex interactions occurring during these co-implantation processes, we have performed an extensive experimental study of the effect of Ge, F, N, C and their combinations on boron. A special interest was given to the overall integration issues. We will show that it is required to optimize the respective locations of co-implanted species with respect to the B profiles (more precisely the ion implantation damage locations), as well as the co-implanted species doses, to get an acceptable compromise between the efficient diffusion decrease required for the junction abruptness and depth, and a reasonable current leakages.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jain, S.C., Schoemaker, W., Lindsay, R., Stolk, P.A., Decoutere, S., Willander, M. & Maes, H.E.J. Appl. Phys., 91 (11), 89198941 (2002)Google Scholar
2 Stolk, P.A., Gossmann, H.J., Jacobson, D.J., Rafferty, C.S., Gilmer, G.H., Jaraiz, M., Poate, J.M., Luftman, H.S. & Haynes, T.E.J. Appl. Phys., 81 (9), 60316050 (1997)Google Scholar
3 Nakashima, S., Takahashi, M., Nakayama, S., and Ohno, T.IEEE, 122–125 (1999)Google Scholar
4 Aronowitz, S., Puchner, H. & Zubcov, V.159–162, IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
5 Cacciato, A., Klappe, J.G.E., Cowern, N.E.B., Vandervorst, W., Biro, L.P., Custer, J.S. & Saris, F.W.J. Appl. Phys., 79 (5), 23142325 (1996)Google Scholar
6 Nejim, A., Barradas, N.P., Jeynes, C., Cristiano, F., Wendler, E., Gärtner, K. & Sealy, B.Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res., B 139, 244248 (1998)Google Scholar
7 Al-Bayati, A., Tandon, S., Mayur, A., Foad, M., Wagner, D., Murto, R., Sing, D., Ferguson, C. & Larson, L. – IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
8 Inaba, S., Murakoshi, A., Tanaka, M., Yoshimura, H., Matsuoka, F. & Toyoshima, Y.IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices, 46 (6), 12181224 (1999)Google Scholar
9 Foad, M.A. & Graoui, H. – Semiconductor manufacturing, August 2005 Google Scholar
10 Jones, C.E., Schafer, D., Scott, W. & Hager, R.J. - J. Appl. Phys., 52 (8), 51485158 (1981)Google Scholar