Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:00:23.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stresses in Films Deposited by Planar Magnetron Sputtering on Glass Substrates of Different Thickness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Zhi-Feng Zhou  and
Yu-Dian Fan
Zhi-Feng Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, CHINA
Yu-Dian Fan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, CHINA
Get access

Abstract

Stresses affect the structure and properties of the films significantly. In this paper, Co-Cr films were deposited by D.C. planar magnetron sputtering on rectangular glass plates of thickness varied from 0.18 to 2.00mam. The measurement of stress was performed by the bending plate technique with the detection of capacitance change. The temperature of the bending plate was measured by an Fe-Ni thin film thermocouple on the back side of the substrate. The experimental results showed that the stresses were all tensile, but in the films on the thicker substrates were smaller than that on the thinner ones. And apparently the temperature rise of the thicker substrates during deposition was lower than that of the thinner ones. The magnetic characteristics of the Co-Cr films related to the substrate thickness may be attributed to both stress and temperature difference in the films deposited on the substrates of different thickness.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 130: Symposium C – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties I , 1988 , 383
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ouchi, K. and Iwasaki, S., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–23,2443 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Desserre, J., Bouchand, J. C., and Jeanniot, D., J. Magn.and Magn. Mat. 54–57, 1683 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Campbell, D. S., in Handbook of Thin Film Technology, edited by Maissel, L. I. and Glang, R. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970), p. 12–21.Google Scholar
4. Stuart, P. R., Vacuum 19, 507 (1969).10.1016/S0042-207X(69)91859-4Google Scholar
5. Wilcock, J. D. and Campbell, D. S., Thin Solid Films 3, 3 (1969).10.1016/0040-6090(69)90107-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Rottmayer, R. E. and Hoffman, R. W., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 7, 461 (1970).10.1116/1.1492904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Kitakami, O., Ojima, K., Ogawa, Y., Maro, T., and Fujiwara, H., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–23, 2797 (1987).10.1109/TMAG.1987.1065375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Laugier, M., Thin Solid Films 67, 163 (1980).10.1016/0040-6090(80)90300-4Google Scholar
9. Sugita, R. and Kobayashi, F., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–18, 1818 (1982).10.1109/TMAG.1982.1062018Google Scholar
10. Hoffman, D. W. and Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 20, 355 (1982).10.1116/1.571463Google Scholar
11. Hoffman, R. W., Daniels, R. D., and Crittenden, E. C. Jr.., Proc. Phys. Soc. london B67, 497 (1954).10.1088/0370-1301/67/6/110Google Scholar
12. Brenner, A. and Senderoff, S., J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 42, 105. (1949).10.6028/jres.042.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hoffman, R. W., in Physics of Nonmetallic Thin Films, edited by Dupuy, C. H. S. and Cachard, A. (NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser., 1976), B14, p. 273.10.1007/978-1-4684-0847-8_12Google Scholar
14. Niimura, Y. and Naoe, M., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–21, 1447 (1985).10.1109/TMAG.1985.1063955Google Scholar
15. Masuya, H. and Awano, H., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–23,206 (1987).Google Scholar