Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:03:41.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Approximation Including Polarisable Ions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. W. Finnis
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Physics, Queen's University, Belfast, BT7 INN, UK
A. T. Paxton
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Physics, Queen's University, Belfast, BT7 INN, UK
M. Methfesselt
Affiliation:
Institute for Semiconductor Physics, Walter-Korsing-Str. 2 D-15230, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
M van Schilfgaarde
Affiliation:
SRI International, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
Get access

Abstract

Until recently, tight-binding has been applied to either covalent or metallic solid state systems, or charge transfer treated in a simple point charge framework. We present a self-consistent tight-binding model which, for the first time, includes electrostatic ion polar-isabihty and crystal field splitting. The tight-binding eigenvectors are used to construct multipole moments of the ionic charges which are used to obtain angular momentum components of the electrostatic potential in structure constant expansions. Our first test of the model is to study the phase stability in zirconia; in particular the instability of the fluorite phase to a spontaneous symmetry breaking, and its interpretation in terms of band effects and ion polarisability. This new formalism opens up the way to apply the tight-binding approximation to problems in which polarisation of atomic charges is important, for example oxides and other ceramic materials and surfaces of metals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kittler, R. C. and Falicov, L. M., Phys. Rev. B, 18, 2506 (1978);Google Scholar
Robbins, M. O. and Falicov, L. M., Phys. Rev. B, 29, 1333 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Harrison, W. A., Phys. Rev. B, 31, 2121 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Majewski, J. A. and Vogl, P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 57, 1366 (1986); Phys. Rev. B, 35, 9679 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Paxton, A. T., J. Phys. D, 29, 1689 (1996)Google Scholar
5. Priester, C., Allan, G. and Lannoo, M., Phys. Rev. B, 33, 7386 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Sutton, A. P., Finnis, M. W., Pettifor, D. G. and Ohta, Y., J. Phys. C, 21, 35 (1988)Google Scholar
7. Wilson, M., Schonberger, U. and Finnis, M. W., Phys. Rev. B, 54, 9147 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Chadi, D. J., in Atomistic simulation of materials, edited by Vitek, V. and Srolovitz, D. J. (Plenum Press, New York, 1989), p. 309.Google Scholar
9. Stone, A. J., The theory of intermolecular forces, (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
10. Griffith, J. S., Theory of transition metal ions, (Cambridge University Press, 1960);Google Scholar
McLure, D. S., in Phonons, edited by Stevenson, R. W. H. (Oliver and Boyd, London, 1966);Google Scholar
Stoneham, A. M., Theory of defects in solids, (Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
11. Andersen, O. K., in NATO ASI: The electronic structure of complex systems, edited by Phariseau, P. and Temmerman, W. M., (Plenum, New York, 1984), p. 11.Google Scholar
12. Methfessel, M., Multipole Green functions for electronic structure calculations, (Katholieke Universiteit te Nijmegen, 1986).Google Scholar
13. Chadi, D. J., Phys. Rev. B, 41, 1062 (1978)Google Scholar
14. Methfessel, M. and van Schilfgaarde, M., NFP Manual 1.00, (IHP-Frankfurt/Oder, 1997).Google Scholar
15. Jansen, H. J. F., Phys. Rev. B, 43, 7267 (1991).Google Scholar