Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:10:22.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pad Conditioning and Pad Surface Characterization in Oxide Chemical Mechanical Polishing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

A. Scott Lawing
A. Scott Lawing*
Affiliation:
Rodel, Inc., 3804 East Watkins Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Get access

Abstract

An understanding of the pad surface state and its effect on the polishing process is critical to a more fundamental understanding of Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP). Vertical Scanning Interferometry has been shown to be a useful tool to monitor the pad surface state. In this paper, various techniques for analyzing pad surface data obtained using interferometry are described. The pad surface state can be modified through the manipulation of process and pad conditioner design parameters. Many of the parameters extracted from interferometry data show strong correlations with corresponding polish data. A careful analysis of these complementary data can yield significant insight into the mechanisms of CMP processes.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 732: Symposium I – Chemical-Mechanical Planarization , 2002 , I5.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Yu, T.K., Yu, C.C. and Orlowski, M., Proceedings of the 1993 International Electron Devices Meeting, p 35.4, (1994).Google Scholar
2 Stein, D., Hetherington, D., Dugger, M. and Stout, T., Journal of Electronic Materials, Vol. 25, No. 10, 1623–1627, (1996).Google Scholar
3 Baker, A.R., Proceedings of the Second International Chemical Mechanical Planarization for VLSI/ULSI Interconnection Conference (CMP-MIC), San Jose CA, 339–342, (1997).Google Scholar
4 Shan, L., Mechanical Interactions at the Interface of Chemical Mechanical Polishing, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Chapter 4, (2000).Google Scholar
5 Lawing, A.S., Proceedings of the Seventh International Chemical Mechanical Planarization for VLSI/ULSI Interconnection Conference (CMP-MIC), San Jose CA, Feb. 27-March 1, 310–317, (2002).Google Scholar
6 Lawing, A.S., Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Chemical Mechanical Planarization, Philadelphia, PA, May 12-17, (2002).Google Scholar
7 Oliver, M.R., Schmidt, R.E. and Robinson, M., Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Chemical Mechanical Planarization, 77–83, (2000).Google Scholar
8 Borucki, L., submitted to Journal of Engineering Mathematics Google Scholar
9 Borucki, L., private communication.Google Scholar
10 Kim, H-j, Kim, D-h and Jeong, H-d, Proceedings of the Seventh International Chemical Mechanical Planarization for VLSI/ULSI Interconnection Conference (CMP-MIC), San Jose CA, Feb. 27-March 1, 201–208, (2002).Google Scholar
11 Baker, A.R., Proceedings of the Semicon West CMP Symposium, San Francisco, CA (1998).Google Scholar
12 Castillo-Mejia, D., Burrows, V. and Beaudoin, S., Submitted to Journal of the Electrochemical Society.Google Scholar
13 Lawing, A.S. and Merchant, T., Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Chemical Mechanical Planarization, 129–140, (2000).Google Scholar