Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:43:47.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of PVD Ti/CVD TiN Liner for 0.35 μm Tungsten Plug Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C.-K. Wang
Affiliation:
National Chiaon Tung University, Dept. Electron. Eng. and Inst. Electron., Hsinchu, Taiwan
L. M. Liu
Affiliation:
Winbond Electronics Corp., Technology Development Division, Hsinchu, Taiwan
D. M. Liao
Affiliation:
Metal CVD Division, Applied Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, CA 95054
D. C. Smith
Affiliation:
Metal CVD Division, Applied Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, CA 95054
M. Danek
Affiliation:
Metal CVD Division, Applied Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, CA 95054
Get access

Abstract

A novel plasma enhanced CVD TiN process was integrated with high density plasma sputter etch preclean (PCII) and 1:1.5 collimated PVD Ti (c-PVD Ti) process to deposit a Ti/TiN liner for tungsten contact and via plugs. The integrated liner process was optimized for a 0.35 μm nonsalicide CMOS device application. RF power and sputter depth used for contact preclean were the major process variants affecting the contact resistance, junction leakage and transistor threshold voltage. Low contact resistance was obtained for a c-PVD Ti thickness of ∼375 Å. Via resistance was significantly lower with c-PVD Ti/CVD TiN liner as compared to only a TiN liner. Contact resistance for c-PVD Ti/c-PVD TiN and c-PVD Ti/CVD TiN liners were comparable while contacts with conventional PVD Ti/TiN liner showed significantly higher values due to poor step coverage. Low junction leakage current was obtained for integrated c- PVD Ti/CVD TiN stack.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sherman, A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 1892 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Hedge, R. I., Fiordalice, R. W., Travis, E. O., Tobin, P. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 11, 1287 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Kaloyeros, A., Faltermeier, C., Goldberg, C., Jones, M., Peterson, G., Akles, B., presented at Advanced Metallization and Interconnect Systems for ULSI Applications. Portland, Oregon, 3–5 October, 1995.Google Scholar
4. Sandhu, G. S., Meikle, S. G., Doan, T. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 240 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Raaijmakers, I. J., Thin Solid Films 247, 85 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Eizenberg, M., Littau, K., Ghanayem, S., Mak, A., Maeda, Y., Chang, M., Sinha, A. K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2416 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Eizenberg, M., Littau, K., Ghanayem, S., Liao, M., Mosely, R., Sinha, A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 590 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Paranjpe, A., IslamRaja, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 2105 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Danek, M., Liao, M., Tseng, J., Littau, K., Saigal, D., Zhang, H., Mosely, R., Eizenberg, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 7, 1015 (1996).Google Scholar