Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:52:55.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurements of Grain Boundary Trap Density and Hydrogen Diffusivity in Polycrystalline Silicon Fet's

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Chad B. Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Bard Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Dieter G. Ast
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Bard Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogen diffusion in as-deposited and in oxidation-annealed polycrystalline silicon films was investigated using n-type accumulation-mode MOSFET's. The diffusion was studied by measuring the reduction in the grain boundary trap density with hydrogenation time. The number of traps in fully hydrogenated as-deposited films fell to about 45% of the initial trap state density and fell to about 20% in the oxidized-annealed films. Concurrently, the mobility increased about 95 % to 5cm2/Vs in the as-deposited films and by about 55 % to 25 cm2/Vs in the oxidized polysilicon devices. The effective preexponential diffusion coefficient and activation energy for hydrogen diffusion in the two different films were Do= 5.4×10−10 cm2/s and EA= 0.37 eV for the as-deposited polysilicon and Do=2.1×10−10 cm2/s and EA= 0.36 eV for the oxidized polysilicon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Kamins, T.I. and , Marcoux. IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL–1, 158–61, 1980.Google Scholar
[2] Seager, C.H. and Ginley, D.S.. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 1050–5, 1981.Google Scholar
[3] Faughnan, B. and Ipri, A.C.. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 36, 101–7, 1989.Google Scholar
[4] Wu, I.W., Lewis, A.G., Huang, T.Y., Chiang, A.. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 10,123–5, 1989.Google Scholar
[5] Proano, R.E., Misage, R.S. and Ast, D.G.. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 36, 1915–22, 1989.10.1109/16.34270Google Scholar
[6] Pollack, G.P., Richardson, W.F., Malhi, S.D.S., Bonified, T., Shichijo, H., Banerjee, S., Elahy, M., Shah, A.H., Womac, R. and Chatterjee, P.K.. IEEE Electon Device Lett. EDL–5, 468–70, 1984.Google Scholar
[7] Seto, J.Y.W.. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 5247–54, 1975.Google Scholar
[8] Levinson, J., Shepherd, F.R., Scanlon, P.J., Westwood, W.D., Este, G. and Rider, A.M.. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 1193–202, 1982.Google Scholar
[9] Baccarani, G., Riccò, B., and Spadini, G.. J. Appl. Phys. 49, 5565–70, 1978.Google Scholar
[10] Kamins, T.I.. Solid-St. Electon. 15, 789–99, 1972.10.1016/0038-1101(72)90100-1Google Scholar
[11] Ahmed, S.S., Kim, D.M., and Shichijo, H.. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED–33, 973–85, 1986.10.1109/T-ED.1986.22603Google Scholar
[12] Proano, R.E. and Ast, D.G.. J. Appl. Phys. 66, 2189–99, 1989.10.1063/1.344317Google Scholar
[13] Antoniadis, D.A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 1093–7, 1982.10.1149/1.2124034Google Scholar
[14] Proafio, R.E., PhD thesis, Cornell University, 1990.Google Scholar
[15] Kamins, T.I.. J. App. Phys. 42, 4357–65, 1971.Google Scholar
[16] Kaplan, D., Sol, N., Velasco, G. and Thomas, P.A.. Appl. Phys. Lett. 3, 440–2, 1978.10.1063/1.90370Google Scholar
[17] Ast, D.C. and Sullivan, T., JPL Report No. 956046-No.3, 1979.Google Scholar
[18] Seager, C.H. and Ginley, D.S.. Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 337–40, 1979.Google Scholar
[19] Kalejs, J.P. and Rajendran, S.. Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2763–5, 1989.Google Scholar
[20] Dubé, C., Hanoka, J.I. and Sandstrom, D.B.. Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 425–7, 1984.Google Scholar
[21] Hashimoto, E. and Kino, T.. J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 13, 1157–65, 1983.Google Scholar
[22] Mayer, J.W. and Lau, S.S.. Electronic Materials Science: For Integrated Circuits in Si and GaAs, (Macmillan Publishing Company, 1990), p. 217.Google Scholar