Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:07:05.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetics Model for the Self-Encapsulation of Ag/Al Bilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Y. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical, Bio, and Materials Engineering NSF Center for Low Power Electronics Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6006, USA
T. L. Alford
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical, Bio, and Materials Engineering NSF Center for Low Power Electronics Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6006, USA
J. W. Mayer
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical, Bio, and Materials Engineering NSF Center for Low Power Electronics Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6006, USA
Get access

Abstract

A model is proposed to describe the temperature dependence of the aluminum oxynitride (AlxOyNz) diffusion barrier formation during a silver self-encapsulation process. These barrier layers form in the temperature range of 500-725 °C during anneals of the Ag/Al bilayers on oxidized Si substrates in an ammonia ambient. Experimental results show that temperature has a significant effect on the kinetics of this process. In this investigation, the diffusion of Al atoms through the Ag layers during self-encapsulation process is modeled using an analytical solution to a modified diffusion equation. This model shows that higher anneal temperatures will minimize the retardation effect by i) reducing the chemical affinity between Al and Ag atoms, and ii) allowing more Al atoms to surmount the interfacial energy barrier between the metal layer (Ag) and the newly formed AlxOyNz diffusion barriers. The theoretical predictions on the amount of segregated Al atom correlate well with experimental results from Rutherford backscattering spectrometry. This model in addition confirms the self-passivation characteristics of AlxOyNz diffusion barriers formed by Ag/Al bilayers annealed between 500∼725 °C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference:

1. Seidel, T. and Zhao, B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.,427, 3 (1996).10.1557/PROC-427-3Google Scholar
2. Alford, T. L., Adams, D., Laursen, T., and Ullrich, B. Manfred, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 23 (1996).10.1063/1.116564Google Scholar
3. Alford, T. L., Li, J., Mayer, J.W., and Wang, S.-Q., Thin Solid Films 262, (1995).10.1016/0040-6090(95)06624-1Google Scholar
4. Wang, Y. and Alford, T. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 52 (1999).10.1063/1.123130Google Scholar
5. Wang, W., Lanford, W. I., and Murarka, S. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 12 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Shalish, I., Gasser, S. M., Kolawa, E., Nicolet, M.-A., and Ruiz, R. P., Thin Solid Films 289, 166 (1996).10.1016/S0040-6090(96)08919-5Google Scholar
7. Interfacial Segregation, edited by Johnson, W. C. and Blakely, J. M. (American Society for Metals, Metal Park, Ohio, 1977), p39.Google Scholar
8. Doolittle, L. R., Nucl. Inst. Meth. Res. B9, 344 (1985).10.1016/0168-583X(85)90762-1Google Scholar
9. Landolt Börnstein New Serie IV/5a, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1961) p5.Google Scholar
10. Crank, J., The Mathematics of Diffusion, second edition, (Claredon Press, Oxford, 1975) p.60 Google Scholar
11. Murr, L. E., Interfacial Phenomena in Metals and Alloys, (Addison-Wesley, London, 1975).Google Scholar
12. Kucera, J. and Million, B., Meta. Trans. 1, 2599 (1970).Google Scholar
13. Lea, C. and Seah, M.P., Phil. Mag, 35, 213 (1977).10.1080/14786437708235984Google Scholar