Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:51:23.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial Design of Silicon/Polypyrrole Junctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Namyong Y. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, U.S.A
Inge E. Vermeir
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, U.S.A
Paul E. Laibinis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogen-terminated silicon surfaces exposing a molecular film of covalently grafted pyrrole units were formed by a solution-phase reaction using the organolithium reagent 5-(N-pyrrolyl)pentyllithium. Electrochemical polymerization of pyrrole onto native hydrogen-terminated silicon surfaces and these chemically modified supports produced silicon/polypyrrole junctions that showed diode-like characteristics, with those formed on the latter substrate exhibiting higher current densities and better ideality factors. The presence of the grafted pyrrole films on silicon provided a better electrochemical control over the polymerization process and yielded smoother polypyrrole films than on the native hydrogen-terminated silicon supports. Impedance measurements revealed that the electrical improvements to the silicon/polypyrrole junctions were a consequence of incorporating sites on the silicon surface for direct contact between the conducting polymer and the semiconductor, as the barrier height of the junction appeared to be unaffected by the chemical modification.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Skotheim, T. A., Ed., Handbook of Conducting Polymers (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1986) Vol. 1.Google Scholar
2. Nagasubramanian, G., DiStefano, S., and Moacanin, J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 305 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Holdcroft, S. and Funt, B. L., J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 3106 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Kokado, H., Hosokawa, F., and Hoshino, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 189 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Watanabe, A., Murukami, S., Mori, K., and Kashiwaba, Y., Macromolecules 22, 4231 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Onganer, Y., Saglam, M., Turut, A., Efeoglu, H., and Tuzemen, S., Solid-State Electronics 39, 677 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Hoshino, K., Tokutomi, K., Iwata, Y., and Kokado, H., J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 711 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Simon, R. A., Ricco, A. J., and Wrighton, M. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 2031 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Kim, N. Y. and Laibinis, P. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 7162 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Vermeir, I. E., Kim, N. Y., and Laibinis, P. E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 3860 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Kim, N. Y. and Laibinis, P. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 4516 (1998).Google Scholar
12. Kim, N. Y. and Laibinis, P. E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 536, 167 (1999).Google Scholar
13. Rubinstein, I., Rishpon, J., Sabatani, E., Redondo, A., and Gottesfeld, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 6135 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Kowalik, J., Tolbert, L., Ding, Y., and Bottomley, L. A., Synth. Metals 55–57, 1171 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Willicut, R. J., and McCarley, R. L., Langmuir 11, 296 (1995).Google Scholar
16. Sayre, C. N., and Collard, D. M., Langmuir 11, 302 (1995).Google Scholar