Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:39:05.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hillock Formation and Reduction Using Metal Interlayers for Active Matrix Display Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Sambit K. Saha
Affiliation:
Display Research LaboratoriesSherman Fairchild Center for Solid State StudiesDept of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceLehigh UniversityBethlehem PA 18015
Robert S. Howell
Affiliation:
Display Research LaboratoriesSherman Fairchild Center for Solid State StudiesDept of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceLehigh UniversityBethlehem PA 18015
Miltiadis K. Hatalis
Affiliation:
Display Research LaboratoriesSherman Fairchild Center for Solid State StudiesDept of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceLehigh UniversityBethlehem PA 18015
Get access

Abstract

The effects of using an extra layer of nickel, cobalt or titanium with Al-1%Cu films were examined with regard to hillock formation. The density and sizes of hillocks in these double layer metallization structures were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and interfacial reactions between the transition metal layer and Al-l%Cu were examined using glancing angle x-ray diffraction (GA-XRD). Resistivities of the double layer films were characterized using conventional 4-point probe measurements. Hillock formation was totally suppressed when Ni and Co was used as the transition metal, while Ti did not eliminate hillocks. Hillock formation and resistivities are explained on the basis of interfacial reactions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Puttlitz, A.F., Ryan, J.G., Sullivan, T.D., IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids and Manufacturing Technology. 7 (12), 619 (1989).Google Scholar
2 Onishi, T., Iwamura, E., Takagi, K. and Yoshikawa, K., J. Vac. Sci. Technology. A 14 (5), 2728 (1996).Google Scholar
3 Iwamura, E., Ohnishi, T. and Yoshikawa, K., Thin Solid Films 270, 450 (1995)Google Scholar
4 Onishi, T., Iwamura, E., Takagi, K. and Watanabe, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technology A 15 (4), 2339 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Lee, Y.K., Fujimura, N., Ito, T. and Nishida, N., J. Vac. Sci and Technology B 9 (5), 2542 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Zhao, y., Xiong, S., Gu, C., Wang, Z.P., Zhou, Z., Meng, Z., Li, J., Dai, Y., Yao, L., Zhang, J.J., Ding, S., Sun, Z.L., Geng, W.D., Li, H.Y. and Li, D.L., Society for Information Display'96 Digest SID, Santa Ana, California, 1996), p345.Google Scholar
7 Kawamura, T., Fujii, K., Honda, K., Iwasaki, K., Tamura, T., Koseki, H., Hotta, S., J. Institute. Television. Engineers. Jpn, 147 (5), 630 (1993).Google Scholar
8 Onoda, H., Takahashi, E., Kawai, Y., Madokaro, S., Fukuyo, H. and Sawada, S., Jpn.J.App.Phys 32 (11a), 4934 (1993).Google Scholar
9 Gardner, D.S., Michalka, T.L., Saraswat, K.C., Barbee, T.W., and Meindl, J.D., International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Applications (Nat. Sci. Council. Ind. Tech. Res. Inst ERSO Hsinchu, Taiwan, 1985) p 157.Google Scholar
10 Gardner, D.S., Michalka, T.L., Saraswat, K.C., Barbee, T.W., McVittie, J.P. and Meindl, J.D., IEEE Journal of Solid-State circuits, SC–20 (1), 94 (1985).Google Scholar
11 Howell, R.S., Saha, S.K. and Hatalis, M.K., presented at Flat Panel Display Materials Symposium (Symposium B), MRS 1998 Spring meeting held in San Fransisco, CA.Google Scholar
12 Chaudhury, p., J. App. Phys, 45 (10), 4339 (1974)Google Scholar