Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:21:22.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Methane Concentration and Hydrogen Treatment on Preferred Orientation in Diamond Films Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D. Ganesan  and
S. C. Sharma
D. Ganesan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Materials Science & Engineering, Program The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019
S. C. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Materials Science & Engineering, Program The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019
Get access

Abstract

We have conducted x-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy analyses of diamond films grown by hot filament assisted chemical vapor deposition (HFCVD). We present results on the relative abundance of the (111), (220) and (400) faces in polycrystalline diamond films as functions of CH4 concentration. The intensity of the (111) peak can be varied from about 20% to 60% by adjusting CH4 in CH4/H2 mixtures. We also present results on preferred orientation in films grown under varying hydrogen treatments. We discuss correlations between the preferred orientation, FWHM of the diamond peak in the Raman spectrum, and surface morphology of the films.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 339: Symposium D – Diamond, Silicon Carbide and Nitride Wide Bandgap Semiconductors , 1994 , 319
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. See excellent papers in, Thin Film Diamond, eds. Lettington, A. H. and Seeds, J. W., Philos. Trans.: Phys. Scien. Eng., 342, 193 (1993).Google Scholar
2. New Diamond Science and Technology, eds. Messier, R., Glass, J. T., Butler, J., and Roy, R., Mater. Res. Soc., (1990).Google Scholar
3. Spear, K. E., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 72, 171 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Badzian, A. R., Badzian, T., Roy, R., Messier, R., and Spear, K. E., Mat. Res. Bull., 23, 531 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Sharma, S. C., Green, M., Hyer, R. C., Dark, C. A., Black, T. D., Chourasia, A. R., Chopra, D. R., and Mishra, K. K., J. Mater. Res. 5, 2424 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Geis, M. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 550 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Kobashi, K., Nishimura, K., Miyata, K., Kumagai, K., and Nakaue, A., J. Mater. Res. 5, 2469 (1990).Google Scholar
8. See Powder Diffraction File, Set 6–10, Published by the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, Card Number : 6–0675, 1967.Google Scholar