Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:59:23.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Ge Content in MBE Si(1-x) Ge(x) on the Evolution of {311} Defects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Robert Crosby ,
Jackie Frazer ,
K. S. Jones ,
Dr. M. E. Law ,
A. Nylandsted Larsen  and
J. Lundsgaard Hansen
Robert Crosby
Affiliation:
University of Florida, SWAMP Group Gainesville, Fl.
Jackie Frazer
Affiliation:
University of Florida, SWAMP Group Gainesville, Fl.
K. S. Jones
Affiliation:
University of Florida, SWAMP Group Gainesville, Fl.
Dr. M. E. Law
Affiliation:
University of Florida, SWAMP Group Gainesville, Fl.
A. Nylandsted Larsen
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, DK-8000, Aarhus, Denmark
J. Lundsgaard Hansen
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, DK-8000, Aarhus, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Molecular beam epitaxial Si1-xGex layers of various Ge concentrations ranging from 0% to 50% were grown on top of a Si substrate. The wafers were then implanted with a 40 keV, 1 x 1014cm-2 Si+. To study the development of {311} defects, the samples were annealed at 750°C for times ranging from 0 to 20 minutes. TEM was utilized to observe both the formation and dissolution of the defects. The Si1-xGex samples with ≤ 5% Ge exhibit {311} defect formation and dissolution; however, samples with the Ge content lying between 15% and 50% showed only dislocation loop formation. It is suggested that the decrease in bond strength with increasing Ge content is the reason for the lack of {311} defect formation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 717: Symposium C – Si Front-End Junction Formation Technologies , 2002 , C1.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Patton, G. L., Comfort, J.H., Meyerso, B.S., Crabbe, E.F., Scilla, G.J., Fresart, E. De, Stork, J.C., Sun, J.Y.C., Harame, D.L., and Burghartz, J.N., IEEE ED Lett. 11, 171, 1990.Google Scholar
[2] Tatsumi, T., Hirayama, H., and Aizaki, N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 895, 1988.Google Scholar
[3] Patton, G.L., Iyer, S.S., Delage, S. L., Tiwari, S., and Stork, J. M. C., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 9,165, 1988.Google Scholar
[4] Temkin, H., Antreasyan, A., Olsson, N. A., Pearsall, T. P., and Bean, J. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 809, 1986.Google Scholar
[5] People, R., IEEE J. Quantum Electron 22, 1696, 1986.Google Scholar
[6] Abstreiter, G., Brugger, H., Wolf, T., Jorke, H., and Herzog, H.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2441, 1985.Google Scholar
[7] Fitzgerald, E.A., Mater. Sci. Rep. 7, 87, 1991.Google Scholar
[8] LeGoues, F. K., Meyerson, B. S., Morar, J. F., and Kirchner, P.D., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 4230, 1992.Google Scholar
[9] Cowern, N. E. B., Jannsen, K. T. F., and Jos, H. F. F.. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 6191, 1990.Google Scholar
[10] Eagelsham, D. J., Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.J., and Poate, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 65, 2305, 1994.Google Scholar
[11] Tan, T. Y., Philosophical Magazine A. 44, 101, 1981.Google Scholar