Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:50:59.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Extended Defects on the Enhanced Diffusion of Phosphorus Implanted Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. H. Keys ,
J. H. Li ,
E. Heitman ,
P. A. Packan ,
M. E. Law  and
K. S. Jones
P. H. Keys
Affiliation:
SWAMP Center, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
J. H. Li
Affiliation:
SWAMP Center, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
E. Heitman
Affiliation:
SWAMP Center, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
P. A. Packan
Affiliation:
Technology CAD Dept., Intel Corp., Hillsboro, OR
M. E. Law
Affiliation:
SWAMP Center, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
K. S. Jones
Affiliation:
SWAMP Center, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Get access

Abstract

Extended defects resulting from ion implantation are believed to act in some cases as a driving force behind transient enhanced diffusion (TED). We use secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to study the diffusion enhancements of an underlying boron doped spike after creating implant damage in the near surface region. Diffusion enhancements are compared for silicon implants and phosphorus implants to distinguish between factors related to chemical species interactions versus those related to ion beam damage. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is used to investigate the existence and dissolution of extended defects. {311} extended defects are clearly visible in self-implanted samples but absent in phosphorus doped samples. The extended defects resulting from phosphorus implantation are small (20Å to 60Å diameter) “dot” defects barely resolvable by conventional TEM. methods. Despite the marked differences in defect morphology, diffusion enhancements in the boron marker layer are observable for both species. Results comparing the TED of a buried marker layer after P+ and Si+ show a larger overall effective diffusion length results after high dose (1x1014 cm−2) phosphorus implants. Visible defects in phosphorus implanted silicon are not the only source of TED, suggesting the existence of sub-microscopic phosphorus interstitial clusters (PIC). This provides important insight into the affect of phosphorus on TED.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 568: Symposium S – Silicon Front-End Processing-Physics & Technology of Dopant… , 1999 , 199
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.-J., Eaglesham, D. J., and Poate, J. M., “Implantation and transient boron diffusion: The role of the silicon self-interstitial,” Proceedings of IIT 94; Nucl. Instr. Meth. B, vol. B96, pp. 187–195, 1995.Google Scholar
[2] Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.-J., Eaglesham, D. J., Jacobson, D. C., Luftman, H. S., and Poate, J. M., “Understanding and Controlling Transient Enhanced Dopant Diffusion in Silicon,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 354, 1995.Google Scholar
[3] Packan, P. A. and Plummer, J. D., “Transient diffusion of low-concentration B due to 29Si implantation damage,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 56, pp. 1787–1789, 1990.Google Scholar
[4] Gossmann, H.-J., Vredenberg, A. M., Rafferty, C. S., Luftman, H. S., Unterwald, F. C., Jacobson, D. C., Boone, T., and Poate, J. M., “Diffusion of dopants in B- and Sb-delta-doped Si films grown in solid-phase epitaxy,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 74, pp. 3150–3155, 1993.Google Scholar
[5] Eaglesham, D. J., Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.-J., and Poate, J. M., “Implantation and Transient B Diffusion in Si: The Source of the Interstitials,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 65, pp. 2305–2307, 1994.Google Scholar
[6] Liu, J., Krishnamoorthy, V., Jones, K. S., Law, M. E., Shi, J., and Bennett, J., “Transient Enhanced Diffusion and Defect Studies in B Implanted Si,” IEEE, pp. 626–629, 1997.Google Scholar
[7] Haynes, T. E., Eaglesham, D. J., Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.-J., Jacobson, D. C., and Poate, J. M., “Interactions of ion-implantation-induced interstitials with boron at high concentrations in silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 69, pp. 1376–1378, 1996.Google Scholar
[8] Desroches, J. B., “Defect Evolution and Transient Enhanced Diffusion in Sub-Amorphous Phosphorus Implanted Silicon,” Master Thesis, Univ. of Florida,1997.Google Scholar
[9] Griffin, P. B., Lever, R. F., Huang, R. Y. S., Kennel, H. W., Packan, P. A., and Plummer, J. D., “Species, Dose and Energy Dependence of Implant Induced Transient Enhanced Diffusion,” IEDM, vol. 12, pp. 295, 1993.Google Scholar
[10] Chao, H. S., Crowder, S. W., Griffin, P. B., and Plummer, J. D., “Species and Dose Dependence of Ion Implantation Damage Induced Transient Enhanced Diffusion,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 79, pp. 2352–2363, 1996.Google Scholar