Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:50:53.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Phase Diagrams for vhf and rf Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition of Si:H Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

G.M. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Center for Thin Film Devices, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA;
A.S. Ferlauto
Affiliation:
Center for Thin Film Devices, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA;
J.M. Pearce
Affiliation:
Center for Thin Film Devices, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA;
C.R. Wronski
Affiliation:
Center for Thin Film Devices, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA;
C. Ross
Affiliation:
2 Institut für Photovoltaik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany;
R.W. Collins
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Deposition phase diagrams are convenient for categorizing the evolution of the surface microstructure and phase with accumulated thickness for hydrogenated silicon (Si:H) films during plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). They can also be used to assess the electronic quality and device suitability of Si:H, based on previous correlations. In this study, phase diagrams have been applied in a comparison of Si:H PECVD using two different plasma excitation frequencies (rf: 13.56 MHz; and vhf: 60 MHz). Smooth crystalline Si (c-Si) wafer substrates have been used to obtain the surface roughness evolution with maximum sensitivity in the amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) growth regime. This study has shown that under all explored conditions of plasma power, frequency, and gas pressure, yielding deposition rates of 0.5-20 Å/s, a-Si:H exhibits improved microstructural characteristics with increasing H2-to-SiH4 flow ratio R right up to the amorphous-to-(mixed-phase microcrystalline) [a→(a+μc)] boundary of the phase diagram. For depositions at R values much lower than the a→(a+μc) transition for a thick film, vhf PECVD can provide a significant improvement in microstructural evolution over rf PECVD, for a given deposition rate. For optimum R just below the a→(a+μc) transition, however, vhf and rf a-Si:H films exhibit remarkably similar structural evolution for a given rate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Shah, A., Meier, J., Vallat-Sauvain, E., Droz, C., Kroll, U., Wyrsch, N., Guillet, J., and Graf, U., Thin Solid Films 403, 179 (2002).Google Scholar
[2] Deng, X., Jones, S.J., Liu, T., Izu, M., and Ovshinsky, S.R., in: Conf. Record of the 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, (IEEE, 1997) p. 591.Google Scholar
[3] Tzolov, M., Finger, F., Carius, R., and Hapke, P., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 7376 (1997).Google Scholar
[4] Fukawa, M., Suzuki, S., Guo, L., Kondo, M., Matsuda, A., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 66, 217 (2001).Google Scholar
[5] Collins, R. W., Ferlauto, A.S., Ferreira, G.M., Chen, C., Koh, J., Koval, R.J., Lee, Y., Pearce, J.M., and Wronski, C.R., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 78, 143 (2003).Google Scholar
[6] Lu, Y., Kim, S., Gunes, M., Lee, Y., Wronski, C. R., and Collins, R. W., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 336 (1994) 595.Google Scholar
[7] Vetterl, O., Finger, F., Carius, R., Hapke, P., Houben, L., Kluth, O., Lambertz, A., Muck, A., Rech, B., and Wagner, H., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 62, 97 (2000).Google Scholar
[8] Matsuda, A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 365 (1998).Google Scholar
[9] For recent results see: Marra, D.C., Kessels, W.M.M., Sanden, M.C.M. van de, Kashefizadeh, K., Aydil, E.S., Surf. Sci. 530, 1 (2003).Google Scholar