Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:48:00.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Vapor Deposition of Copper Films: Influence Of The Seeding Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Kyoung-Ryul Yoon
Affiliation:
Dept. of Ceramic Engr., Yonsei Univ., Shinchon-Dong 134, Sudaemoon-Ku, Seoul, Korea 120-749
Seok Kim
Affiliation:
Dept. of Ceramic Engr., Yonsei Univ., Shinchon-Dong 134, Sudaemoon-Ku, Seoul, Korea 120-749
Doo-Jin Choi
Affiliation:
Dept. of Ceramic Engr., Yonsei Univ., Shinchon-Dong 134, Sudaemoon-Ku, Seoul, Korea 120-749
Ki-Hwan Kim
Affiliation:
Dept. of Ceramic Engr., Yonsei Univ., Shinchon-Dong 134, Sudaemoon-Ku, Seoul, Korea 120-749
Seok-Keun Koh
Affiliation:
Div. of Ceramics, Korea Institute of Science & Technology, Cheongryang P.O. Box 131, Seoul, Korea 136-791
Get access

Abstract

The low pressure chemical vapor deposition of Cu was investigated on TiN substrates that had been locally seeded with thin Cu layers. These Cu layers were 5Å, 40Å and 130Å thick and had been produced by PIB (Partially Ionized Beam) deposition. The growth rate and the XRD peak intensity ratio (I(111)/I(200)) of CVD-Cu increased somewhat in the case of Cu seeded TiN/Si substrates compared with as-received TiN/Si substrate. At the deposition temperature of 200°C, Cu film deposited on the 40Å seeded substrate had the lowest electrical resistivity value, 2.42 μ Ω cm that is as high as 1.5 times the bulk copper value. In adhesion test, as the seeding thickness increased from 0Å to 130Å, the adhesion strength increased from 21 N to 27 N.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Murarka, S.P., Gutmann, R.J., Kaloyeros, A.E., and Lanford, W.A., Thin Solid Films, 236, 257 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Jain, A., Chi, K.M., Kodas, T.T., and Hampden-Smith, M.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 140 (5), 1435 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Temple, D. and Reisman, A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 136 (11), 3525 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Lecohier, B., Calpini, B., Plilippoz, J.M., Bergh, H.V., Laub, D., and Buffat, P.A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 140 (3), 789 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Lecohier, B., Calpini, B., Plilippoz, J.M., and Bergh, H.V., J. Appl. Phys., 72 (5), 2022 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Lecohier, B., Plilippoz, J.M., and Bergh, H.V., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 10 (1), 262 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Yamada, I., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 37, 77 (1989).Google Scholar