Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:09:56.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Hydrophobic Forces for in Liquid Self-Assembly of Micron-Sized Functional Building Blocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2011

M. R. Gullo
Affiliation:
Microsystems Laboratory, Institute of Microtechnology, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
L. Jacot-Descombes
Affiliation:
Microsystems Laboratory, Institute of Microtechnology, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
L. Aeschimann
Affiliation:
Nanoworld AG, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland
J. Brugger
Affiliation:
Microsystems Laboratory, Institute of Microtechnology, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents the experimental and numerical study of hydrophobic interaction forces at nanometer scale in the scope of engineering micron-sized building blocks for self-assembly in liquid. The hydrophobic force distance relation of carbon, Teflon and dodeca-thiols immersed in degassed and deionized water has been measured by atomic force microscopy. Carbon and dodeca-thiols showed comparable attractive and binding forces in the rage of pN/nm2. Teflon showed the weakest binding and no attractive force. Molecular dynamic simulations were performed to correlate the molecular arrangement of water molecules and the hydrophobic interactions measured by atomic force microscopy. The simulations showed a depletion zone of 2Å followed by a layered region of 8Å in the axis perpendicular to the hydrophobic surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mastrangeli, M., et al. ., Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 19, (2009).Google Scholar
2. Azam, A., et al. ., Biomedical Microdevices 1 (2010).Google Scholar
3. Clark, T.D., et al. ., Journal of the American Chemical Society 123, 7677 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Xiaorong, X., Sheng-Hsiung, L., and Bohringer, K.F. in Geometric binding site design for surface-tension driven self-assembly, (Proceedings. ICRA ’04. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004.) pp. 1141 Google Scholar
5. Meyer, E.E., Rosenberg, K.J., and Israelachvili, J., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 15739 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Chandler, D., Nature 437, 640 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Fisher, T.E., et al. ., Trends in Biochemical Sciences 24, 379 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fa, K.Q., Nguyen, A.V., and Miller, J.D., Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 13112 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Levy, R. and Maaloum, M., Nanotechnology 13, 33 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Berendsen, H.J.C., Grigera, J.R., and Straatsma, T.P., Journal of Physical Chemistry 91, 6269 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Koishi, T., et al. ., J. Chem. Phys. 123, (2005).Google Scholar
12. Jorgensen, W.L. and Gao, J., Journal of the American Chemical Society 110, 4212 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar