Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:19:08.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ArF Excimer Laser-Induced Epitaxial Growth of GaAs Films on Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Shirley S. Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Methodist University. Dallas, Texas 75275
T. L. Cpu
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Methodist University. Dallas, Texas 75275
C. L. Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Methodist University. Dallas, Texas 75275
Get access

Abstract

Epitaxial gallium arsenide films have been deposited on single crystalline GaAs substrates of {100} orientation and Si substrates of 3° off the {100} orientation by ArF excimer laser-induced metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. The important process parameters include the cleanliness of the substrate surface, substrate temperature, the composition, flow rate, and pressure of the reaction mixture, and the pulse energy and pulse rate of the laser. Particular attention was directed to the in-situ cleaning of the substrate surface prior to the deposition process. Homoepitaxial gallium arsenide films of good structural perfection have been deposited at 425°- 500 ° C and their single crystallinity has been confirmed by transmission electron microscopy. The carrier concentration decreases with increasing AsH3/(CH3)3 Ga molar ratio and with decreasing substrate temperature. Lower growth rate during the initial stage of deposition is necessary to obtain heteroepitaxial gallium arsenide films on Si with good structural perfection. The TEM examination of GaAs films of 0.15–0.2 µm thickness deposited on Si substrates at 500 °C has shown that stacking faults were present in the GaAs films; however, there is no apparent threading dislocations in the surface region of the thin GaAs film.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Fischer, R., Masselink, W. T., Klein, J., Henderson, T., McGlinn, T. C., Klein, M. V., Morkoc, H., Mazur, J. H., and Washburn, J., J. Appl. Phys., 58, 374 (1985).Google Scholar
[2] Otsuka, N., Choi, C., Nakamura, Y., Nagakura, S., Fisher, R., Peng, C. K., and Morkoc, H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 49, 277 (1986).Google Scholar
[3] Pearton, S. J., Vernon, S. M., Abernathy, C. R., Short, K. T., Caruso, R., Stavola, M., Gibson, J. M., Haven, V. E., White, A. E., and Jacobson, D. C., J. Appl. Phys., 62, 862 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Donnelly, V. M., Brasen, D., Appelbaum, A., and Geva, M., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 2022 (1985).Google Scholar
[5] Donnelly, V. M., McGrary, V. R., Appelbaum, A., Brasen, D., and Lowe, W. P., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 1410 (1987).Google Scholar