Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:27:56.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spheroid three-dimensional culture enhances Notch signaling in cardiac progenitor cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2017

Arianna Mauretti*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Fabrizio Rossi
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
Noortje A. M. Bax
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Carmen Miano
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
Fabio Miraldi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Respiratorie, Nefrologiche e Geriatriche, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy
Marie José Goumans
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
Elisa Messina
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neuropsychiatry, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
Alessandro Giacomello
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
Carlijn V. C. Bouten
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Cecilia Sahlgren
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Cell biology, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520 Turku, Finland Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520 Turku, Finland
*
Address all correspondence to Arianna Mauretti at [email protected]

Abstract

Cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) are a promising candidate for cardiac regeneration, and the interaction between CPCs and their microenvironment can influence their regenerative response. Notch signaling plays a key role in cell fate decisions in the developing and adult heart. Here, we investigated the effect of three-dimensional (3D) spheroid culture, as a model of the 3D microenvironment, on Notch in fetal and adult human CPCs, under room air (20%) and physiological (5%) oxygen tension. Notch signaling is enhanced in 3D spheroids; spheroid culture under 5% O2 further increases Notch signaling enhancement, and might ultimately improve the regenerative potential of CPCs.

Type
Biomaterials for 3D Cell Biology Research Letter
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors, published on behalf of Materials Research Society by Cambridge University Press, 2017

Introduction

Cardiac disease is one of the main causes of death worldwide. After injury, the heart muscle displays very limited regeneration, in which resident cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) seem to play a role.[Reference Emmert, Emmert, Martens, Ismail, Schmidt-Richter, Gawol, Seifert, Haverich, Martin and Gruh1] Despite their acknowledged regenerative potential,[Reference Zwetsloot, Végh, Jansen Of Lorkeers, Van Hout, Currie, Sena, Gremmels, Buikema, Goumans, Macleod, Doevendans, Chamuleau and Sluijter2Reference Bollini, Smart and Riley4] very little is known about the actual role of CPCs, particularly of human origin, in cardiac repair and regeneration. Among the different CPC populations that have been identified, human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (CMPCs) represent a promising candidate for cardiac regeneration, due to their presence in fetal and adult heart, and the capacity to differentiate into the three cardiac lineages (cardiomyocytes, endothelial, and smooth muscle cells).[Reference van Vliet, Goumans, Doevendans and Sluijter3, Reference Smits, van Vliet, Metz, Korfage, Sluijter, Doevendans and Goumans5] Another interesting source of human CPCs is represented by the cardiosphere model. Cardiospheres (CSps) are cardiac-derived multicellular spheroids, spontaneously formed by cells migrating from cardiac tissue explants and subsequently cultured on a poly-D-lysine-coated dish.[Reference Messina, De Angelis, Frati, Morrone, Chimenti, Fiordaliso, Salio, Battaglia, Latronico, Coletta, Vivarelli, Frati, Cossu and Giacomello6, Reference Chimenti, Gaetani, Barile, Forte, Ionta, Angelini, Frati, Messina, Giacomello and Singh7] CSps can serve as an interesting in vitro model of the cardiac stem cell niche.[Reference Li, Cheng, Lee, Matsushita, Davis, Malliaras, Zhang, Matsushita, Smith and Marbán8] Compared with traditional two-dimensional (2D) culture, multicellular spheroids provide a microenvironment that more closely mimics the in vivo physiology. These model systems recapitulate key features of the endogenous cell niche, such as improved cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix (ECM) contacts, as well as gradients of oxygen and nutrients between periphery and core of the spheroid.[Reference Li, Cheng, Lee, Matsushita, Davis, Malliaras, Zhang, Matsushita, Smith and Marbán8Reference Achilli, Meyer and Morgan11] Improved knowledge on the mechanisms that regulate CPC behavior and functions, such as survival, proliferation, and differentiation, is needed. In particular, the interaction of CPCs with the niche in which they reside is of pivotal importance to ultimately direct their behavior toward cardiac regeneration.

Notch is a cell–cell signaling pathway that regulates many cellular functions, such as survival, proliferation, and differentiation.[Reference Luxán, D'Amato, MacGrogan and De La Pompa12Reference Collesi, Zentilin, Sinagra and Giacca14] In the heart, Notch is essential during development,[Reference Nemir and Pedrazzini15, Reference De la Pompa and Epstein16] and it is inactivated in cardiomyocytes after birth.[Reference Collesi, Zentilin, Sinagra and Giacca14] However, its reactivation after myocardial damage indicates that Notch plays a key role in cardiac repair.[Reference Boni, Urbanek, Nascimbene, Hosoda, Zheng, Delucchi, Amano, Gonzalez, Vitale, Ojaimi, Rizzi, Bolli, Yutzey, Rota, Kajstura, Anversa and Leri13, Reference Rizzo, Mele, Caliceti, Pannella, Fortini, Clementz, Morelli, Aquila, Ameri and Ferrari17] In CPCs, activation of the Notch pathway is known to induce cell proliferation,[Reference Boni, Urbanek, Nascimbene, Hosoda, Zheng, Delucchi, Amano, Gonzalez, Vitale, Ojaimi, Rizzi, Bolli, Yutzey, Rota, Kajstura, Anversa and Leri13] and is needed for the onset of cardiomyogenic differentiation, at the same time maintaining the cells in a proliferative state.[Reference Boni, Urbanek, Nascimbene, Hosoda, Zheng, Delucchi, Amano, Gonzalez, Vitale, Ojaimi, Rizzi, Bolli, Yutzey, Rota, Kajstura, Anversa and Leri13]

Here we use CSps, of both adult (CSps) and fetal origin (CMPC-CSps), as a model to investigate the Notch pathway in CPCs under room air (20% O2) and tissue physiological (5% O2) oxygen tension (often referred to as “hypoxia”). Our results show that a 3D in-vivo-like microenvironment, as provided by the CSp system, enhances Notch signaling in fetal and adult CPCs as compared with the respective cell monolayers. Moreover, the signaling enhancement provided by the 3D culture is further increased under hypoxic conditions. These findings provide fundamental knowledge on the interactions between CPCs and the conditions of the cardiac microenvironment, such as 3D culture and different oxygen tension conditions.

Materials and methods

CMPCs were isolated from fetal human hearts by magnetic sorting using Sca-1-coupled beads. L9TB cell line was immortalized by lentiviral transduction of hTert and BMI-1, and cultured in SP++ growth medium, according to published protocols.[Reference Smits, van Vliet, Metz, Korfage, Sluijter, Doevendans and Goumans5] CMPC-CSps were obtained by seeding L9TB CMPCs on poly-D-lysine-coated 12-multiwell plates with a density of 1.6 × 104 cells/cm2 and cultured in CSp medium (CSM). Adult explant-derived cells (EDCs) were isolated from human surgical auricular biopsies, as previously described.[Reference Messina, De Angelis, Frati, Morrone, Chimenti, Fiordaliso, Salio, Battaglia, Latronico, Coletta, Vivarelli, Frati, Cossu and Giacomello6, Reference Chimenti, Gaetani, Barile, Forte, Ionta, Angelini, Frati, Messina, Giacomello and Singh7] Once 80% of confluency was reached, EDCs were collected and seeded on poly-D-lysine-coated 12-multiwell plates with a cell density of 9 × 103 cells/cm2 to form CSps. CMPC-CSps and CSps spontaneously formed after 5 days of culture in either room air (20% O2) or physiologic (5% O2) oxygen conditions, and collected at this time-point. CSps were seeded on a fibronectin-coated flask to obtain CSp derived cells (CDCs). CMPCs, CMPC-CSps, EDCs, CSps, and CDCs were grown in either room air (20% O2) or in tissue physiologic (5% O2) oxygen conditions Table I; for details on cell isolation methods and culture medium composition; see Supplementary Material).

Total RNA was isolated from one sample per group per experiment (n = 4 for fetal CPCs; n = 3–7 for adult CPCs) using the Qiagen RNAeasy isolation kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized with 250 ng RNA per sample using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Bio-Rad) and subjected to qPCR using iQTM Green Supermix and the CFX384 detection system (Bio-Rad). Primer sequences for qPCR and annealing temperatures are presented in Table II.

Table I. Schematic summary of all cell type and culture conditions used in this article.

Table II. List of sequences and annealing temperatures (T a) of used primers (Fw: forward; Rv: reverse).

For immunofluorescence labeling, all samples were washed with PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) at 37 °C, fixed in 3.7% (v/v) formaldehyde for 15 min, and rinsed four times with washing buffer (see Supplementary Material). A blocking step in 1% horse serum was followed by staining with primary and secondary antibodies, and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclear staining. Used antibodies and dyes are listed in Table III. Immunofluorescence images were acquired with a Leica TCS SP5X confocal microscope.

Table III. List of used antibodies and dyes.

All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). For qPCR data analysis, cycle-threshold (C t) values were normalized to the reference gene (GAPDH) value, and signals of CMPC-CSps, CSps, and CDCs were compared with those of the cell monolayer (CMPCs and EDCs for fetal and adult cells, respectively) and presented as fold change (2–ΔΔCt). A list of C t values of fetal and adult cells is presented in Supplementary Tables SI and SII, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed with Graphpad Prism 5.04. Student's t-test or Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc for multiple comparisons were performed where appropriate. Significance was assumed for P < 0.05.

Results

Notch signaling is enhanced in CPC spheroids

The effect of 3D culture on Notch signaling in fetal (CMPC-CSps) and adult (CSps) CPCs was evaluated by analyzing the gene expression of Notch receptors Notch 1 (N1), Notch 2 (N2), and Notch 3 (N3), Notch ligand Jagged 1 (Jag1), and target gene Hey1, as compared with the respective cell monolayer from which the CSps derive (CMPCs and EDCs for fetal and adult, respectively). Under 20% O2, CMPC-CSps and CMPC monolayer showed a similar expression of N1. However, CMPC-CSps displayed increased expression of N2 and N3 (2.0- and 2.5-folds), and Jag1 (1.9-fold) [Fig. 1(a)], and a 13.8-fold upregulation of the target gene Hey1 [Fig. 1(b)].

Figure 1. Notch signaling is enhanced by 3D spheroid culture in human CPCs. (a–d) Gene expression of Notch components (N1, N2, N3, Jag1) and target gene (Hey1) in (a, b) fetal CMPC-CSps (n = 4) and (c, d) adult CSps (n = 3–7) cultured under 20% oxygen. (e, f) Immunofluorescent staining for Notch 2 (N2) in CMPCs (e) and CMPC-CSps (f) cultured at 20% oxygen. Nuclei are stained with DAPI. Scale bar 50 µm. Statistical test: Student's t-test for CMPC-CSps, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-test for adult CSps. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Adult CSps displayed upregulation of N1 and N3 (2.2- and 2.9-folds, respectively) as compared with both adult cell monolayers (EDCs and CDCs), whereas N2 and Jag1 showed similar gene expression levels in all samples, although a modest downregulation was shown in CDCs as compared with CSps [Fig. 1(c)]. Significant upregulation of Hey1 was observed in CSps as compared with both EDCs and CDCs [6.6-fold change; Fig. 1(d)].

Immunofluorescent staining revealed the presence of the N2 receptor in the cell nuclei in CMPC-CSps as well as in the CMPC monolayers, supporting the activation of Notch signaling suggested by the gene expression data [Fig. 1(e, f)]. Similar protein localization was observed in adult CSps and cell monolayers (EDCs, CDCs; Supplementary Fig. S2). Staining for N1 and N3 showed localization to the cell membrane and around the cell nuclei, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S1).

These results indicate that spheroid 3D culture favors the activation of Notch signaling in CPCs, more evidently in adult CSps than in fetal CMPC-CSps.

Notch signaling enhancement in CPC spheroids is increased by physiologic oxygen culture

Oxygen tension is known to regulate many cell functions via the hypoxia and the Notch pathways, and is a key player in the stem cell niche.[Reference Main, Lee, Yang, Haapa-Paananen, Edgren, Jin, Sahlgren, Kallioniemi, Poellinger, Lim and Lendahl18Reference Gustafsson, Zheng, Pereira, Gradin, Jin, Lundkvist, Ruas, Poellinger, Lendahl and Bondesson20] Therefore, we examined Notch signaling in fetal and adult CSps under physiological oxygen conditions (5% O2). CMPC-CSps exhibited an increase in the RNA expression of all Notch components [Fig. 2(a)], and a remarkable upregulation of the target gene Hey1 was observed [46.8-fold; Fig. 2(b)].

Figure 2. Notch signaling enhancement by 3D spheroid culture is increased by combination with physiological oxygen conditions in human CPCs. (a–d) Gene expression of Notch components (N1, N2, N3, Jag1) and target gene (Hey1) in (a, b) fetal CMPC-CSps (n = 4) and (c, d) adult CSps (n = 3–7) cultured under 5% oxygen. (e, f) Immunofluorescent staining for Notch 2 (N2) in CMPCs (e) and CMPC-CSps (f) cultured at 5% oxygen. Nuclei are stained with DAPI. Scale bar 50 µm. Statistical test: Student's t-test for CMPC-CSps, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-test for adult CSps.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Similarly, adult CSps showed upregulation of N1 and N3 markers (2.3- and 2.2-folds, respectively) as compared with the monolayers (EDCs and CDCs), despite a slight downregulation of Jag1 (0.5-fold). No differences in the expression of N2 were observed between the three cell types [Fig. 2(c)]. Activation of the Notch downstream targets in adult CSps was demonstrated by Hey1 upregulation [22.7-fold; Fig. 2(d)].

Immunofluorescence staining showed the presence of N2 in the cell nuclei in CMPC-CSps and in the respective cell monolayer [Fig. 2(e, f)].

To determine the effect of hypoxia on Notch signaling in each cell type (adult and fetal CPCs) and culture condition (monolayer, CSps), we evaluated the expression of Notch markers at 5% O2 as compared with 20% O2. In fetal CMPCs and CMPC-CSps, a general downregulation of all markers was observed [Supplementary Fig. S3(a, b)], except for a 2.1-fold upregulation of Hey1 in CMPC-CSps at 5% O2. In adult cells (CDCs, CSps), no changes were observed at 5% oxygen, except for a modest increase in the expression of N1 in CDCs (1.5-fold) and of Jag1 in CSps (1.5-fold) [Supplementary Fig. S3(c, d)].

The presented results indicate that the enhanced expression of Notch components and target genes in fetal and adult 3D CSps is further improved by culture under physiological oxygen tension.

Discussion and outlook

Multicellular spheroids, such as CSps, represent an in vitro model of the cardiac niche.[Reference Li, Cheng, Lee, Matsushita, Davis, Malliaras, Zhang, Matsushita, Smith and Marbán8, Reference Davis, Zhang, Smith, Cheng, Terrovitis, Malliaras, Li, White, Makkar and Marbàn21] The 3D environment and enhanced cell–cell and cell–ECM contacts offered by CSps can stimulate several molecular signaling and cellular functions. Notch is a highly conserved pathway that plays a key role in determining cell fate decisions in the heart. In CPCs, activation of Notch is needed to initiate cardiomyogenic differentiation;[Reference Boni, Urbanek, Nascimbene, Hosoda, Zheng, Delucchi, Amano, Gonzalez, Vitale, Ojaimi, Rizzi, Bolli, Yutzey, Rota, Kajstura, Anversa and Leri13] furthermore, transplantation of CPCs with increased Notch activity results in decreased infarct area and improved functions in an infarcted heart model.[Reference Gude, Joyo, Toko, Quijada, Villanueva, Hariharan, Sacchi, Truffa, Joyo, Voelkers, Alvarez and Sussman22] Previous studies have shown upregulation of Notch receptors 1 and 3 in CSps, as compared with the respective cell monolayer.[Reference Forte, Miraldi, Chimenti, Angelini, Zeuner, Giacomello, Mercola and Messina23] Here, the upregulation of Notch receptors, and more importantly of the target gene Hey1 (13.8- and 6.6-folds in fetal and adult cells, respectively), suggests activation of Notch pathway in fetal and adult CPCs cultured as CSps. Moreover, in the presence of a physiological oxygen condition (5%), the 3D culture seemed to lead to an even stronger activation of Notch, as indicated by the enhanced upregulation of Hey1 (46.8- and 22.7-folds in fetal and adult CPCs, respectively).

Interestingly, in CPC monolayers grown under 5% O2 the expression of Notch components and target genes is either decreased (fetal CPCs) or unchanged (adult CPCs) as compared with the 20% O2 culture (Supplementary Fig. S3). However, when CPCs are grown as CSps under 5% O2, the enhancement of Notch signaling is even stronger as compared with 20% O2, suggesting that the 3D culture is needed for activation of Notch signaling increased under physiological oxygen tension in CPCs. In particular the reported data suggest that, in both fetal and adult CPCs, N2 is the component that translocates to the cell nuclei in response to spheroid formation as a result of Notch signaling activation. However, unlike fetal CPCs where all Notch markers are upregulated by the 3D culture, in adult CSps the gene expression of N2 seems unvaried as compared with the cell monolayer, indicating that in adult CPCs the activation of Notch is not due to increased RNA levels. The observation might be explained by the different developmental stage of the two cell types, and a distinct response to environmental factors on Notch signaling in fetal and adult cells.

Altogether, our findings suggest that in vivo-like conditions, as provided by the 3D spheroid system, particularly under with physiologic oxygen tension, enhance Notch signaling in human CPCs, of both fetal and adult origin. Given the role of Notch in CPCs, this might be an important mechanism for several cell aspects of cardiac regeneration, such as maintenance of the CPC pool via enhanced survival and proliferation, maintenance of CPC multipotency and tissue homeostasis. However, it is tempting to speculate that a further increased activation of Notch (due to lower oxygen concentrations) might induce differentiation of CPCs into the cardiomyogenic lineage, resulting in improved extracellular matrix production and remodeling,[Reference Bax, van Marion, Shah, Goumans, Bouten and van der Schaft24] mechanical integration,[Reference Mauretti, Bax, van Marion, Goumans, Sahlgren and Bouten25] and might ultimately favor cardiac regeneration (Fig. 3). Further studies are needed in order to better understand the influence of microenvironmental conditions on human CPCs, and disclose their full potential for cardiac regeneration.

Figure 3. Hypothesized putative mechanisms triggered by environmental conditions in CPCs. (a) In the cell monolayer, Notch activity is very low; (b, c) 3D spheroid culture provides improved cell–cell and cell–ECM contact and gradients of oxygen and nutrients,[Reference Günter, Wolint, Bopp, Steiger, Cambria, Hoerstrup and Emmert9, Reference di Costanzo, Giacomello, Messina, Natalini, Pontrelli, Rossi, Smits and Twarogowska26] more similar to the in vivo environment. This results in enhanced Notch activation and might thus lead to: (b) CPC proliferation and maintenance of the stem cell pool and of niche homeostasis (20% O2); or (c) cardiac differentiation, increased ECM production and modulation, mechanical integration and ultimately to a cardioprotective effect and cardiac regeneration (5% O2).

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2017.82

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the People Program (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Program FP7-People-2012-ITN “TECAS”, under grant agreement n. 317512 and the FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG “Stressfate”, under grant agreement n. 618623. Dr. ir. Mark van Turnhout (Eindhoven University of Technology) is thankfully acknowledged for his help with confocal image analysis.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

1.Emmert, M.Y., Emmert, L.S., Martens, A., Ismail, I., Schmidt-Richter, I., Gawol, A., Seifert, B., Haverich, A., Martin, U., and Gruh, I.: Higher frequencies of BCRP+ cardiac resident cells in ischaemic human myocardium. Eur. Heart J. 34, 28302838 (2013).Google Scholar
2.Zwetsloot, P.P., Végh, A.M.D., Jansen Of Lorkeers, S.J., Van Hout, G.P.J., Currie, G.L., Sena, E.S., Gremmels, H., Buikema, J.W., Goumans, M.J., Macleod, M.R., Doevendans, P.A., Chamuleau, S.A.J., and Sluijter, J.P.G.: Cardiac stem cell treatment in myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies. Circ. Res. 118, 12231232 (2016).Google Scholar
3.van Vliet, P., Goumans, M.-J., Doevendans, P. A., and Sluijter, J.P.G.: Human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells: a short history of nearly everything. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 16, 16691673 (2012).Google Scholar
4.Bollini, S., Smart, N., and Riley, P.R.: Resident cardiac progenitor cells: at the heart of regeneration. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 50, 296303 (2011).Google Scholar
5.Smits, A.M., van Vliet, P., Metz, C.H., Korfage, T., Sluijter, J.P., Doevendans, P., and Goumans, M.J.: Human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells differentiate into functional mature cardiomyocytes: an in vitro model for studying human cardiac physiology and pathophysiology. Nat. Protoc. 4, 232243 (2009).Google Scholar
6.Messina, E., De Angelis, L., Frati, G., Morrone, S., Chimenti, S., Fiordaliso, F., Salio, M., Battaglia, M., Latronico, M.V.G., Coletta, M., Vivarelli, E., Frati, L., Cossu, G., and Giacomello, A.: Isolation and expansion of adult cardiac stem cells from human and murine heart. Circ. Res. 95, 911921 (2004).Google Scholar
7.Chimenti, I., Gaetani, R., Barile, L., Forte, E., Ionta, V., Angelini, F., Frati, G., Messina, E., and Giacomello, A.: Isolation and expansion of adult cardiac stem/progenitor cells in the form of cardiospheres from human cardiac biopsies and murine hearts, in Somatic Stem Cells: Methods and Protocols, edited by Singh, S.R., (Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2012) vol. 879, pp. 327338.Google Scholar
8.Li, T.S., Cheng, K., Lee, S.-T., Matsushita, S., Davis, D., Malliaras, K., Zhang, Y., Matsushita, N., Smith, R.R., and Marbán, E.: Cardiospheres recapitulate a niche-like microenvironment rich in stemness and cell-matrix interactions, rationalizing their enhanced functional potency for myocardial repair. Stem Cells 28, 20882098 (2010).Google Scholar
9.Günter, J., Wolint, P., Bopp, A., Steiger, J., Cambria, E., Hoerstrup, S.P., and Emmert, M.Y.: Microtissues in cardiovascular medicine: regenerative potential based on a 3D microenvironment. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 120 (2016).Google Scholar
10.Gattazzo, F., Urciuolo, A., and Bonaldo, P.: Extracellular matrix: a dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Gen. Subj. 1840, 25062519 (2014).Google Scholar
11.Achilli, T.M., Meyer, J., and Morgan, J.R.: Advances in the formation, use and understanding of multi-cellular spheroids. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 12, 13471360 (2012).Google Scholar
12.Luxán, G., D'Amato, G., MacGrogan, D., and De La Pompa, J.L.: Endocardial Notch signaling in cardiac development and disease. Circ. Res. 118, e1e18 (2016).Google Scholar
13.Boni, A., Urbanek, K., Nascimbene, A., Hosoda, T., Zheng, H., Delucchi, F., Amano, K., Gonzalez, A., Vitale, S., Ojaimi, C., Rizzi, R., Bolli, R., Yutzey, K.E., Rota, M., Kajstura, J., Anversa, P., and Leri, A.: Notch1 regulates the fate of cardiac progenitor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 1552915534 (2008).Google Scholar
14.Collesi, C., Zentilin, L., Sinagra, G., and Giacca, M.: Notch1 signaling stimulates proliferation of immature cardiomyocytes. J. Cell Biol. 183, 117128 (2008).Google Scholar
15.Nemir, M. and Pedrazzini, T.: Functional role of Notch signaling in the developing and postnatal heart. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 45, 495504 (2008).Google Scholar
16.De la Pompa, J.L. and Epstein, J.A.: Coordinating tissue interactions: Notch signaling in cardiac development and disease. Dev. Cell 22, 244254 (2012).Google Scholar
17.Rizzo, P., Mele, D., Caliceti, C., Pannella, M., Fortini, C., Clementz, A.G., Morelli, M.B., Aquila, G., Ameri, P., and Ferrari, R.: The role of notch in the cardiovascular system: potential adverse effects of investigational notch inhibitors. Front. Oncol. 4, 111 (2014).Google Scholar
18.Main, H., Lee, K.L., Yang, H., Haapa-Paananen, S., Edgren, H., Jin, S., Sahlgren, C., Kallioniemi, O., Poellinger, L., Lim, B., and Lendahl, U.: Interactions between Notch- and hypoxia-induced transcriptomes in embryonic stem cells. Exp. Cell Res. 316, 16101624 (2010).Google Scholar
19.Lendahl, U., Lee, K.L., Yang, H., and Poellinger, L.: Generating specificity and diversity in the transcriptional response to hypoxia. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 821832 (2009).Google Scholar
20.Gustafsson, M.V., Zheng, X., Pereira, T., Gradin, K., Jin, S., Lundkvist, J., Ruas, J.L., Poellinger, L., Lendahl, U., and Bondesson, M.: Hypoxia requires Notch signaling to maintain the undifferentiated cell state. Dev. Cell 9, 617628 (2005).Google Scholar
21.Davis, D.R., Zhang, Y., Smith, R.R., Cheng, K., Terrovitis, J., Malliaras, K., Li, T.S., White, A., Makkar, R., and Marbàn, E.: Validation of the cardiosphere method to culture cardiac progenitor cells from myocardial tissue. PLoS ONE 4, e7195 (2009).Google Scholar
22.Gude, N., Joyo, E., Toko, H., Quijada, P., Villanueva, M., Hariharan, N., Sacchi, V., Truffa, S., Joyo, A., Voelkers, M., Alvarez, R., and Sussman, M.A.: Notch activation enhances lineage commitment and protective signaling in cardiac progenitor cells. Basic Res. Cardiol. 110 (2015). doi: 10.1007/s00395-015-0488-3.Google Scholar
23.Forte, E., Miraldi, F., Chimenti, I., Angelini, F., Zeuner, A., Giacomello, A., Mercola, M., and Messina, E.: TGFβ-dependent epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is required to generate cardiospheres from human adult heart biopsies. Stem Cells Dev.. 21, 30813090 (2012).Google Scholar
24.Bax, N. A. M., van Marion, M.H., Shah, B., Goumans, M.-J., Bouten, C.V.C., and van der Schaft, D.W.J.: Matrix production and remodeling capacity of cardiomyocyte progenitor cells during in vitro differentiation. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 53, 497508 (2012).Google Scholar
25.Mauretti, A., Bax, N.A. M., van Marion, M.H., Goumans, M.J., Sahlgren, C., and Bouten, C.V.C.: Cardiomyocyte progenitor cell mechanoresponse unrevealed: strain avoidance and mechanosome development. Integr. Biol. 8, 9911001 (2016).Google Scholar
26.di Costanzo, E., Giacomello, A., Messina, E., Natalini, R., Pontrelli, G., Rossi, F., Smits, R., Twarogowska, M.: A discrete in continuous mathematical model of cardiac progenitor cells formation and growth as spheroid clusters (Cardiospheres). Math. Med. Biol. 124 (2017). pii: dqw022, doi: 10.1093/imammb/dqw022Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table I. Schematic summary of all cell type and culture conditions used in this article.

Figure 1

Table II. List of sequences and annealing temperatures (Ta) of used primers (Fw: forward; Rv: reverse).

Figure 2

Table III. List of used antibodies and dyes.

Figure 3

Figure 1. Notch signaling is enhanced by 3D spheroid culture in human CPCs. (a–d) Gene expression of Notch components (N1, N2, N3, Jag1) and target gene (Hey1) in (a, b) fetal CMPC-CSps (n = 4) and (c, d) adult CSps (n = 3–7) cultured under 20% oxygen. (e, f) Immunofluorescent staining for Notch 2 (N2) in CMPCs (e) and CMPC-CSps (f) cultured at 20% oxygen. Nuclei are stained with DAPI. Scale bar 50 µm. Statistical test: Student's t-test for CMPC-CSps, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-test for adult CSps. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Notch signaling enhancement by 3D spheroid culture is increased by combination with physiological oxygen conditions in human CPCs. (a–d) Gene expression of Notch components (N1, N2, N3, Jag1) and target gene (Hey1) in (a, b) fetal CMPC-CSps (n = 4) and (c, d) adult CSps (n = 3–7) cultured under 5% oxygen. (e, f) Immunofluorescent staining for Notch 2 (N2) in CMPCs (e) and CMPC-CSps (f) cultured at 5% oxygen. Nuclei are stained with DAPI. Scale bar 50 µm. Statistical test: Student's t-test for CMPC-CSps, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-test for adult CSps.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Hypothesized putative mechanisms triggered by environmental conditions in CPCs. (a) In the cell monolayer, Notch activity is very low; (b, c) 3D spheroid culture provides improved cell–cell and cell–ECM contact and gradients of oxygen and nutrients,[9,26] more similar to the in vivo environment. This results in enhanced Notch activation and might thus lead to: (b) CPC proliferation and maintenance of the stem cell pool and of niche homeostasis (20% O2); or (c) cardiac differentiation, increased ECM production and modulation, mechanical integration and ultimately to a cardioprotective effect and cardiac regeneration (5% O2).

Supplementary material: File

Mauretti et al supplementary material

Mauretti et al supplementary material 1

Download Mauretti et al supplementary material(File)
File 32.3 MB