Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:48:23.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optical thermal insulation via the photothermal effects of Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@Cu2−xS thin films for energy-efficient single-pane windows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

Jou Lin ,
Yuan Zhao  and
Donglu Shi
Jou Lin
Affiliation:
The Materials Science and Engineering Program, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221, USA
Yuan Zhao
Affiliation:
The Materials Science and Engineering Program, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221, USA
Donglu Shi*
Affiliation:
The Materials Science and Engineering Program, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Donglu Shi at [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

To address critical energy issues in civic structures, we have developed a novel concept of optical thermal insulation (OTI) without relying on a conventional thermal intervention medium, such as air or argon, as often used in conventional window systems. We have synthesized the photothermal (PT) materials, such as the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@Cu2−xS nanoparticles, that exhibit strong UV and near-infrared (NIR) absorptions but with good visible transparency. Upon coating the inner surface of the window glass with a PT film, under solar irradiation, the inner surface temperature rises due to the PT effect. Subsequently, the temperature difference, ΔT, is reduced between the single pane and room interior. This leads to lower the thermal loss through a window, reflected by the U-factor, resulting in considerable energy saving without double- or triple-glazing. Comparing with the Fe3O4 coatings, Fe3O4@Cu2−xS is spectrally characterized with a much stronger NIR absorbance, contributing to an increased PT efficiency under simulated solar irradiation (0.1 W/cm2). PT experiments are carried out via both white light and monochromic NIR irradiations (785 nm). The parameters associated with the thermal performance of the PT films are calculated, including PT conversion efficiency, specific absorption rate (SAR), and U-factor. Based on the concept of OTI, we have reached an optimum U-factor of 1.46 W/m2 K for a single pane, which is satisfactory to the DOE requirement (<1.7 W/m2 K).

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 155 - 163
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.U.S. Energy Information Administration: United States: International Energy Outlook 2019 with projections to 2050, 2019.Google Scholar
2.ARPA-E: Single-pane highly insulating efficient lucid designs (SHIELD) program overview, 2014.Google Scholar
3.National Fenestration Rating Council Incorporated: ANSI/NFRC 100-2017 [E0A2]: procedure for determining fenestration product U-factors. National Fenestration Rating Council Incorporated, July 18, 2018.Google Scholar
4.ASTM G173-03: Standard tables for reference solar spectral irradiances: direct normal and hemispherical on 37° tilted surface. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2012. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?G173Google Scholar
5.Huang, X., El-Sayed, I.H., Qian, W., and El-Sayed, M.A.: Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2115–2120 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Feng, L., Wu, L., and Qu, X.: New horizons for diagnostics and therapeutic applications of graphene and graphene oxide. Adv. Mater. 25, 168–186 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Shi, D., Sadat, M.E., Dunn, A.W., and Mast, D.B.: Photo-fluorescent and magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Nanoscale 7, 8209–8232 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Chu, M., Shao, Y., Peng, J., Dai, X., Li, H., Wu, Q., and Shi, D.: Near-infrared laser light mediated cancer therapy by photothermal effect of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Biomaterials 34, 4078–4088 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Tian, Q., Hu, J., Zhu, Y., Zou, R., Chen, Z., Yang, S., Li, R., Su, Q., Han, Y., and Liu, X.: Sub-10 nm Fe3O4@Cu2−XS core-shell nanoparticles for dual-modal imaging and photothermal therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8571–8577 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Zhao, R., Sun, X., Sun, J., Wang, L., and Han, J.: Polypyrrole-modified CuS nanoprisms for efficient near-infrared photothermal therapy. RSC Adv. 7, 10143–10149 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Zaitoun, M.A., Mason, W.R., and Lin, C.-T.: Magnetic circular dichroism spectra for colloidal gold nanoparticles in xerogels at 5.5 K. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 6780–6784 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Melinger, J.S., Kleiman, V.D., McMorrow, D., Gröhn, F., Bauer, B.J., and Amis, E.: Ultrafast dynamics of gold-based nanocomposite materials. J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 3424–3431 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Zhao, Y., Sadat, M.E., Dunn, A.W., Xu, H., Chen, C.-H., Nakasuga, W., Ewing, R.C., and Shi, D.: Photothermal effect on Fe3O4 nanoparticles irradiated by white-light for energy-efficient window applications. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 161, 247–254 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Wei, T., Liu, Y., Dong, W., Zhang, Y., Huang, C., Sun, Y., Chen, X., and Dai, N.: Surface-dependent localized surface plasmon resonances in CuS nanodisks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 10473–10477 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Shabaninezhad, M. and Ramakrishna, G.: Theoretical investigation of size, shape, and aspect ratio effect on the LSPR sensitivity of hollow-gold nanoshells. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 144116 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Sadat, M.E., Baghbador, M.K., Dunn, A.W., Wagner, H.P., Ewing, R., Zhang, J., Xu, H., Pauletti, G., Mast, D., and Shi, D.: Photoluminescence and photothermal effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for medical imaging and therapy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 091903 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Jiang, K., Smith, D.A., and Pinchuk, A.: Size-dependent photothermal conversion efficiencies of plasmonically heated gold nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 27073–27080 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Kanehara, M., Koike, H., Yoshinaga, T., and Teranishi, T.: Indium tin oxide nanoparticles with compositionally tunable surface plasmon resonance frequencies in the near-IR region. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17736–17737 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Lassiter, J.B., Aizpurua, J., Hernandez, L., Brandl, D., Romero, I., Lal, S., Hafner, J., Nordlarder, P., and Halas, N.: Close encounters between two nanoshells. Nano Lett. 8, 1212–1218 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.De Faria, D., Venâncio Silva, S., and De Oliveira, M.T.: Raman microspectroscopy of some iron oxides and oxyhydroxides. J. Raman Spectrosc. 28, 873–878 (1997).3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Jin, H., Lin, G., Bai, L., Amjad, M., Bandarra Filho, E.P., and Wen, D.: Photothermal conversion efficiency of nanofluids: an experimental and numerical study. Solar Energy 139, 278–289 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Zhao, Y., Dunn, A., and Shi, D.: Effective reduction of building heat loss without insulation materials via the photothermal effect of a chlorophyll thin film coated “Green Window”. MRS Commun. 9, 675–681 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.ASTM C1199-14: Standard test method for measuring the steady-state thermal transmittance of fenestration systems using hot box methods. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2014. www.astm.orgGoogle Scholar
24.ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Residential Windows, Doors, and Skylights: https://www.energystar.gov/products/building_products/residential_windows_doors_and_skylights/key_product_criteria#performanceCriteria (accessed October 31, 2019).Google Scholar