Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:43:53.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the bending strength of single-crystal silicon theta-like specimens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2013

Rebecca Kirkpatrick
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
William A. Osborn
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Michael S. Gaither
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Richard S. Gates
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Frank W. DelRio
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Robert F. Cook*
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
*
Address all correspondence to Robert F. Cook at[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A new theta geometry was developed for microscale bending strength measurements. This new “gap” theta specimen was a modification of the arch theta specimen that enabled microscale tensile testing. The gap theta specimen was demonstrated here on single-crystal silicon, microfabricated using two different etch processes. The resulting sample strengths were described by three-parameter Weibull distributions derived from parameters determined using established arch theta strengths, assuming a specimen-geometry and -size invariant flaw distribution and an approximate loading configuration.

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Gaither, M.S., DelRio, F.W., Gates, R.S., Fuller, E.R. Jr., and Cook, R.F.: Strength distribution of single-crystal silicon theta-like specimens. Scripta Mater. 63, 422 (2010).Google Scholar
2Durelli, A.J., Morse, S., and Parks, V.: The theta specimen for determining tensile strength of brittle materials. Mater. Res. Standards 2, 114 (1962).Google Scholar
3Fuller, E.R. Jr., Henann, D.L., and Ma, L.: Theta-like specimens for measuring mechanical properties at the small-scale: effects of non-ideal loading. Int. J. Mater. Res. 98, 729 (2007).Google Scholar
4Quinn, G.D., Fuller, E., Xiang, D., Jillavenkatesa, A., Ma, L., Smith, D., and Beall, J.:A novel test method for measuring mechanical properties at the small-scale: the theta specimen, In Mechanical Properties and Performance of Engineering Ceramics and Composites, edited by Lara-Curzio, E. (Ceramic Eng. Sci. Proc. 26, Westerville, OH, 2005), p. 117.Google Scholar
5Gaither, M.S., DelRio, F.W., Gates, R.S., and Cook, R.F.: Deformation and fracture of single-crystal silicon theta-like specimens. J. Mater. Res. 26, 2575 (2011).Google Scholar
6Gaither, M.S., Gates, R.S., Kirkpatrick, R., Cook, R.F., and DelRio, F.W.: Etching process effects on surface structure, fracture strength, and reliability of single-crystal silicon theta-like specimens. J. Microelectromech. Syst. (2013). DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2012.2234724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Senturia, S.D.: Microsystem Design (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2001).Google Scholar
8Tachi, S., Tsujimoto, K., and Okudaira, S.: Low-temperature reactive ion etching and microwave plasma-etching of silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 616 (1988).Google Scholar
9Logan, D.L.: A First Course in the Finite Element Method (Thomson, Toronto, 2007).Google Scholar
10McSkimin, H.J. and Andreatch, P. Jr.: Measurement of third-order moduli of silicon and germanium. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 3312 (1964).Google Scholar
11Weibull, W.: A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech. 18, 293 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Todinov, M.T.: Probability of fracture initiated by defects. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 276, 39 (2000).Google Scholar
13Nemeth, N.N., Manderscheid, J.M., and Gyekenyesi, J.P.: Designing ceramic components with the CARES computer program. Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 68, 2064 (1989).Google Scholar
14Weil, N.A. and Daniel, I.M.: Analysis of fracture probabilities in nonuniformly stressed brittle materials. J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 47, 268 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Weihs, T.P., Hong, S., Bravman, J.C., and Nix, W.D.: Mechanical deflection of cantilever microbeams: a new technique for testing the mechanical properties of thin films. J. Mater. Res. 3, 931 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar