Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T10:34:49.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modification with ultrasonication for enhanced properties of cobalt-based zeolitic imidazolate framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2018

Shuyang Sun
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
Pengcheng Wang
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
Ming Lu*
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
*
Address all correspondence to Lu Ming at [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Effective modification of existing supported catalyst has attracted plenty of interests recently. Herein, we introduced ultrasonication to synthesize the palladium-loaded cobalt-based zeolitic imidazolate framework and compared its properties with those using the conventional method. Remarkably, the ultrasonicated frameworks possess 15.33% higher of Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area and 63.37% higher of t-plot external surface area, respectively, which lead up to 23% rise in the degradation of organic pollutants under optimized conditions. Characterizations clearly revealed the causality between ultrasonication, morphology, and catalytic performance compared with their non-ultrasonicated counterparts which further demonstrates a simple but useful method for the modification of supported catalysts.

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Li, H.-C., Liu, W.-J., Han, H.-X., and Yu, H.-Q.: Hydrophilic swellable metal–organic framework encapsulated Pd nanoparticles as an efficient catalyst for Cr(VI) reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 11680 (2016).Google Scholar
2.Gu, X., Lu, Z.-H., Jiang, H.-L., Akita, T., and Xu, Q.: Synergistic catalysis of metal–organic framework-immobilized Au–Pd nanoparticles in dehydrogenation of formic acid for chemical hydrogen storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11822 (2011).Google Scholar
3.Banach, E.M., Stil, H.A., and Geerlings, H.: Aluminium hydride nanoparticles nested in the porous zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 324 (2012).Google Scholar
4.Mukoyoshi, M., Kobayashi, H., Kusada, K., Hayashi, M., Yamada, T., Maesato, M., Taylor, J.M., Kubota, Y., Kato, K., and Takata, M.: Hybrid materials of Ni NP@ MOF prepared by a simple synthetic method. Chem. Commun. 51, 12463 (2015).Google Scholar
5.Seoane, B., Zamaro, J.M., Tellez, C., and Coronas, J.: Sonocrystallization of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-7, ZIF-8, ZIF-11 and ZIF-20). CrystEngComm 14, 3103 (2012).Google Scholar
6.Cho, H.-Y., Kim, J., Kim, S.-N., and Ahn, W.-S.: High yield 1-L scale synthesis of ZIF-8 via a sonochemical route. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 169, 180 (2013).Google Scholar
7.Jusoh, N., Yeong, Y.F., Mohamad, M., Lau, K.K., and Shariff, A.M.: Rapid-synthesis of zeolite T via sonochemical-assisted hydrothermal growth method. Ultrason. Sonochem. 34, 273 (2017).Google Scholar
8.Basnayake, S.A., Su, J., Zou, X., and Balkus, K.J. Jr.: Carbonate-based zeolitic imidazolate framework for highly selective CO2 capture. Inorg. Chem. 54, 1816 (2015).Google Scholar
9.Zhu, Q.-L. and Xu, Q.: Metal–organic framework composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5468 (2014).Google Scholar
10.Zare, Y.: Study of nanoparticles aggregation/agglomeration in polymer particulate nanocomposites by mechanical properties. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 84, 158 (2016).Google Scholar
11.Dergunov, S.A., Kim, M.D., Shmakov, S.N., Richter, A.G., Weigand, S., and Pinkhassik, E.: Inside back cover: tuning optical properties of encapsulated clusters of gold nanoparticles through stimuli-triggered controlled aggregation (Chem. Eur. J. 23/2016). Chem. Eur. J. 22, 7987 (2016).Google Scholar
12.Hervés, P., Pérez-Lorenzo, M., Liz-Marzán, L.M., Dzubiella, J., Lu, Y., and Ballauff, M.: Catalysis by metallic nanoparticles in aqueous solution: model reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 5577 (2012).Google Scholar
13.Saka, E.T. and Çağlar, Y.: New Co(II) and Cu(II) phthalocyanine catalysts reinforced by long alkyl chains for the degradation of organic pollutants. Catal. Letters 147, 1471 (2017).Google Scholar
14.Wu, W., Lei, M., Yang, S., Zhou, L., Liu, L., Xiao, X., Jiang, C., and Roy, V.A.L.: A one-pot route to the synthesis of alloyed Cu/Ag bimetallic nanoparticles with different mass ratios for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 3450 (2015).Google Scholar
15.Fang, H., Wen, M., Chen, H., Wu, Q., and Li, W.: Graphene stabilized ultra-small CuNi nanocomposite with high activity and recyclability toward catalysing the reduction of aromatic nitro-compounds. Nanoscale 8, 536 (2016).Google Scholar
16.Mojtabazade, F., Mirtamizdoust, B., Morsali, A., and Talemi, P.: Sonochemical synthesis and structural determination of novel the nano-card house Cu(II) metal-organic coordination system. Ultrason. Sonochem. 35, 226 (2017).Google Scholar
17.Belova, V., Gorin, D.A., Shchukin, D.G., and Möhwald, H.: Selective ultrasonic cavitation on patterned hydrophobic surfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 7129 (2010).Google Scholar
18.Israr, F., Chun, D., Kim, Y., and Kim, D.K.: High yield synthesis of Ni-BTC metal-organic framework with ultrasonic irradiation: role of polar aprotic DMF solvent. Ultrason. Sonochem. 31, 93 (2016).Google Scholar
19.Israr, F., Kim, D.K., Kim, Y., Oh, S.J., Ng, K.C., and Chun, W.: Synthesis of porous Cu-BTC with ultrasonic treatment: effects of ultrasonic power and solvent condition. Ultrason. Sonochem. 29, 186 (2016).Google Scholar
20.Nikseresht, A., Daniyali, A., Ali-Mohammadi, M., Afzalinia, A., and Mirzaie, A.: Ultrasound-assisted biodiesel production by a novel composite of Fe(III)-based MOF and phosphotangestic acid as efficient and reusable catalyst. Ultrason. Sonochem. 37, 203 (2017).Google Scholar
21.Razavi, S.A.A., Masoomi, M.Y., and Morsali, A.: Ultrasonic assisted synthesis of a tetrazine functionalized MOF and its application in colorimetric detection of phenylhydrazine. Ultrason. Sonochem. 37, 502 (2017).Google Scholar
22.Nadar, S.S. and Rathod, V.K.: Encapsulation of lipase within metal-organic framework (MOF) with enhanced activity intensified under ultrasound. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 108, 11 (2018).Google Scholar
23.Abuzalat, O., Wong, D., Elsayed, M., Park, S., and Kim, S.: Sonochemical fabrication of Cu(II) and Zn(II) metal-organic framework films on metal substrates. Ultrason. Sonochem. 45, 180 (2018).Google Scholar
24.Abbasi, A.R., Karimi, M., and Daasbjerg, K.: Efficient removal of crystal violet and methylene blue from wastewater by ultrasound nanoparticles Cu-MOF in comparison with mechanosynthesis method. Ultrason. Sonochem. 37, 182 (2017).Google Scholar
25.Liang, L., Tursun, Y., Nulahong, A., Dilinuer, T., Tunishaguli, A., Gao, G., Abulikemu, A., and Okitsu, K.: Preparation and sonophotocatalytic performance of hierarchical Bi 2 WO 6 structures and effects of various factors on the rate of Rhodamine B degradation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 39, 93 (2017).Google Scholar
26.Vishwakarma, R.S. and Gogate, P.R.: Intensified oxalic acid crystallization using ultrasonic reactors: understanding effect of operating parameters and type of ultrasonic reactor. Ultrason. Sonochem. 39, 111 (2017).Google Scholar
27.González-García, J., Sáez, V., Tudela, I., Díez-Garcia, M.I., Deseada Esclapez, M., and Louisnard, O.: Sonochemical treatment of water polluted by chlorinated organocompounds. A review. Water (Basel) 2, 28 (2010).Google Scholar
28.Mu, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, J., and Guo, C.: Effect of ultrasound pretreatment on the hydrothermal synthesis of SSZ-13 zeolite. Ultrason. Sonochem. 38, 430 (2017).Google Scholar
29.Zhao, F. and Cheng, D.: Changes in pore size distribution inside sludge under various ultrasonic conditions. Ultrason. Sonochem. 38, 390 (2017).Google Scholar
30.Jawale, R.H., Tandale, A., and Gogate, P.R.: Novel approaches based on ultrasound for treatment of wastewater containing potassium ferrocyanide. Ultrason. Sonochem. 38, 402 (2017).Google Scholar
31.Abdi, J., Vossoughi, M., Mahmoodi, N.M., and Alemzadeh, I.: Synthesis of amine-modified zeolitic imidazolate framework-8, ultrasound-assisted dye removal and modeling. Ultrason. Sonochem. 39, 550 (2017).Google Scholar
32.Qian, J., Sun, F., and Qin, L.: Hydrothermal synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) nanocrystals. Mater. Lett. 82, 220 (2012).Google Scholar
33.Noori, Y., Akhbari, K., Phuruangrat, A., and Costantino, F.: Studies the effects of ultrasonic irradiation and dielectric constants of solvents on formation of lead (II) supramolecular polymer; new precursors for synthesis of lead (II) oxide nanoparticles. Ultrason. Sonochem. 35, 36 (2017).Google Scholar
34.Lin, L., Zhang, T., Zhang, X., Liu, H., Yeung, K.L., and Qiu, J.: New Pd/SiO2@ZIF-8 core–shell catalyst with selective, antipoisoning, and antileaching properties for the hydrogenation of alkenes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53, 10906 (2014).Google Scholar
35.Zhao, Y., Liu, M., Fan, B., Chen, Y., Lv, W., Lu, N., and Li, R.: Pd nanoparticles supported on ZIF-8 as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the selective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde. Catal. Commun. 57, 119 (2014).Google Scholar
36.Li, F.L., Li, H.X., and Lang, J.P.: Fabrication of yolk–shell Pd@ZIF-8 nanoparticles with excellent catalytic size-selectivity for the hydrogenation of olefins. Crystengcomm 18, 1760 (2016).Google Scholar
37.Zhou, A., Guo, R.M., Zhou, J., Dou, Y., Chen, Y., and Li, J.R.: Pd@ZIF-67 derived recyclable Pd-based catalysts with hierarchical pores for high-performance heck reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 2103 (2018).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sun et al. supplementary material

Sun et al. supplementary material 1

Download Sun et al. supplementary material(File)
File 550.9 KB