Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:38:28.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micromechanical testing of electroplated gold alloy films using theta-like specimens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2015

Mark J. McLean ,
William A. Osborn ,
Rebecca Kirkpatrick ,
Oliver Boomhower ,
Christopher Keimel  and
Frank W. DelRio
Mark J. McLean*
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
William A. Osborn
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Rebecca Kirkpatrick
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Oliver Boomhower
Affiliation:
Micro and Nano Structures Technologies Group, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York 12309
Christopher Keimel
Affiliation:
Micro and Nano Structures Technologies Group, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York 12309
Frank W. DelRio
Affiliation:
Applied Chemicals and Materials Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305
*
Address all correspondence to Mark J. McLean at[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Micromechanical testing of electroplated gold alloy films has been conducted using theta-like specimens. Specimens were formed by a standard combination of photolithography, electroplating, and deep reactive ion etching. Testing was performed using an instrumented indenter and the results interpreted using a finite-element model with a Ramberg–Osgood constitutive law to extract elastic and plastic material properties. The observed results were highly repeatable and appear to be sensitive to variations in both sample dimensions and material properties. These qualities suggest that the testing methodology may have significant value as a quality control technique in the fabrication of metal microelectromechanical systems.

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 503 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Keimel, C., Claydon, G., Li, B., Park, J., and Valdes, M.E.: Micro-Electromechanical-System (MEMS) based switches for power applications. Conf. Records – Industrial & Commercial Power Systems Technical Conf., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Newport Beach, CA, 2011. p. 1.Google Scholar
2.Pillans, B., Kleber, J., Goldsmith, C., and Eberly, M.: RF power handling of capacitive RF MEMS devices (IEEE MTT – Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, Seattle, WA, 2002) p. 329.Google Scholar
3.Uchic, M.D., Shade, P.A., and Dimiduk, D.M.: Plasticity of micrometer-scale single crystals in compression. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 39, 361 (2009).Google Scholar
4.Greer, J.R., and Nix, W.D.: Size dependence of mechanical properties of gold at the sub-micron scale. Appl. Phys. A 80, 1625 (2005).Google Scholar
5.Kiener, D., Grosinger, W., Dehm, G., and Pippan, R.: A further step towards an understanding of size-dependent crystal plasticity: in situ tension experiments of miniaturized single-crystal copper samples. Acta Mater. 56, 580 (2008).Google Scholar
6.Takahashi, Y., Kondo, H., Niimi, H., and Nokuo, T.: Fracture strength analysis of single-crystalline silicon cantilevers processed by focused ion beam. Sens. Actuators A 206, 81–87 (2014).Google Scholar
7.Gaither, M.S., DelRio, F.W., Gates, R.S., Fuller, E.R. Jr., and Cook, R.F.: Strength distribution of single-crystal silicon theta-like specimens. Scr. Mater. 63, 422 (2010).Google Scholar
8.Lord, J.D., Roebuck, B., Morrell, R., and Lube, T.: Aspects of strain and strength measurement in miniaturized testing for engineering metals and ceramics. Mater. Sci. Technol. 26, 127 (2010).Google Scholar
9.Gaither, M.S., Gates, R.S., Kirkpatrick, R., Cook, R.F., and DelRio, F.W.: Etching process effects on surface structure, fracture strength, and reliability of single-crystal silicon theta-like specimens. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 22, 589–602 (2013).Google Scholar
10.Gaither, M.S., DelRio, F.W., Gates, R.S., and Cook, R.F.: Deformation and fracture of single-crystal silicon theta-like specimens. J. Mater. Res. 26, 2575 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Ramberg, W., and Osgood, W.R.: Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters. Natl. Advis. Comm. Aeronaut. Tech. Note 902 (1943).Google Scholar
12.Hertzberg, R.W.: Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, 4th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 1995).Google Scholar
13.Espinosa, H.D., and Prorok, B.C.: Size effects on the mechanical behavior of gold thin films. J. Mater. Sci. 38, 4125 (2003).Google Scholar
14.Gates, R.S., and Pratt, J.R.: Accurate and precise calibration of AFM cantilever spring constants using laser Doppler vibrometry. Nanotechnology 23, 375702 (2012).Google Scholar
15.Gates, R.S., and Reitsma, M.G.: Precise atomic force microscope cantilever spring constant calibration using a reference cantilever array. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 086101 (2007).Google Scholar
16.Chasiotis, I., Bateson, C., Timpano, K., McMarty, A.S., Barker, N.S., and Stanec, J.R.: Strain rate effects on the mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline Au films. Thin Solid Films 515, 3183 (2007).Google Scholar
17.Yang, Z., Lichtenwalner, D.J., Morris, A.S., Krim, J., and Kingon, A.I.: Comparison of Au and Au-Ni alloys as contact materials for MEMS switches. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 18, 287 (2009).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

McLean supplementary material S1

Supplemental Material Revised

Download McLean supplementary material S1(Image)
Image 20.5 MB
Supplementary material: Image

McLean supplementary material S2

Supplemental Material Revised

Download McLean supplementary material S2(Image)
Image 131.8 KB
Supplementary material: Image

McLean supplementary material S3

Supplemental Material Revised

Download McLean supplementary material S3(Image)
Image 122.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

McLean supplementary material S4

Supplemental Material Revised

Download McLean supplementary material S4(File)
File 56.3 KB